Disposed¶25

The Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. v. Sri. K Ganganna

Karnataka HC7 Nov 2025WP/10342/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition by memo; disposal in terms of memo with consent of both sides; Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. (petitioner-management, represented by Head-HR & IR) v. K.Ganganna; labour/industrial relations matter (L-TER); Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; Karnataka High Court single judge (Jyoti M, J.); pending IAs disposed, interim directions discharged; no merits adjudication, no cases cited, no amounts — citable only as an instance of withdrawal by memo, not for any ratio.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition; petition disposed of in terms of the memo, pending interlocutory applications, if any, disposed of and any interim direction discharged. ¶25

The Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. Vs Sri. K… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:45162 WP No. 10342 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 10342 OF 2023 (L-TER)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

THE MANAGEMENT OF BHARAT FRITZ WERNER LTD., OFF. TUMKUR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560022 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI. S.N.MISHRA, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS HEAD - HR AND IR MR. PRASHANT A.R., (COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956). …PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. PRASHANTH B.R., ADVOCATE)

¶11

Digitally signed AND: by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH SRI. K.GANGANNA, COURT OF SPECIAL PURPOSE MACHINES DIVISION, KARNATAKA BHARAT FRITZ WERNER LTD., R/AT NO.56, 7^TH CROSS, 1^ST MAIN, 2^ND BLOCK, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560096.

¶12

…RESPONDENT

¶13

(BY SRI. GURUPRASAD S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.J.SRINIVASAN, ADVOCATE)

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

¶15

AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:45162 WP No. 10342 of 2023

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

Sri.Prashanth.B.R., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Guruprasad.S., counsel on behalf of Sri.A.J.Srinivasan., for the respondent have appeared in person.

¶22

Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be disposed of in terms of the memo.

¶23

Counsel for the respondent acknowledges the said submission and submits that the Writ Petition may be disposed of in terms of the memo.

¶24

The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties and the memo is placed on record.

¶25

Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the memo.

¶26

¶27

NC: 2025:KHC:45162 WP No. 10342 of 2023

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29