Dismissed¶32

Devidas S/O Veerappa Palekar v. Nagaraj S/O Narayan Naik

Karnataka HC1 Apr 2025WP/101985/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench; WP No. 101985 of 2025 (GM-CPC); NC: 2025:KHC-D:5779; Devidas Palekar v. Nagaraj Naik, Shankar Naik, Nitin @ Hemanth Naik and Lohit Naik; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; dismissed as withdrawn on 01-04-2025; withdrawal memo placed on record; undertaking not to seek recalling; single judge: Justice Jyoti Mulimani; no substantive adjudication, no citations, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with counsel's oral submission and the withdrawal memo placed on record. ¶32

Devidas S/O Veerappa Palekar Vs Nagaraj S/O… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5779 WP No. 101985 of 2025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶4

DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101985 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

DEVIDAS S/O VEERAPPA PALEKAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED, R/O: HUBLI ROAD, DIST: SIRSI.

¶10

… PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. NARAYAN V.YAJI., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

NAGARAJ S/O NARAYAN NAIK, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER, R/O: BHENDI BAZAR, ANKOLA, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.

¶14

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SHANKAR S/O MAHADEV NAIK, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: HOSMANE, AT POST: CHIPAGI, YELLAPUR ROAD, TQ: SIRSI, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.

¶16

NITIN @ HEMANTH S/O SHANKAR NAIK, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE OF TEACHERS CO-OP BANK, SAGAR, R/O: HOSAMANE, AT POST: CHIPAGI, YELLAPUR ROAD, TQ: SIRSI, DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.

¶17

LOHIT S/O SHANKAR NAIK, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5779 WP No. 101985 of 2025

¶20

OCC: STUDENT, R/O: HOSAMANE, AT POST: CHIPAGI, YELLAPUR ROAD, TQ: SIRSI, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA.

¶21

… RESPONDENTS

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Sri.Narayan V.Yaji., counsel for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing.

¶26

Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶27

When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits

¶28

that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same.

¶29