Dismissed¶31

Pandurang S/O Ramanna Tondur v. the Chief Secretary

Karnataka HC17 Nov 2025WP/101739/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench; writ petition rejected for non-compliance with office objections; Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India; writ of mandamus; representations; disciplinary action against Tahashildar, Hangal, District Haveri; last opportunity; interim order extension; M. Nagaprasanna, J.; 17.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

None; the petition stands rejected for non-compliance with the office objections. ¶31

Pandurang S/O Ramanna Tondur Vs the Chief Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:15734 WP No. 101739 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 101739 OF 2025 (S-RES)

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

PANDURANG S/O. RAMANNA TONDUR, AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. HAVANAGI, TQ. HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI.

¶7

…PETITIONER

¶8

(BY SRI. K. S. KORISHETTAR, ADVOCATE)

¶9

AND:

¶10

THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶11

THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶12

Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR

¶13

Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad

¶14

THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., DEPARTMENT OF PERSONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMATION, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.

¶15

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, JILLA ADALITH BHAVAN, HAVERI-581110.

¶16

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAVANUR REVENUE SUB-DIVISION, SAVANUR, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 5 TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND INITIATE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST THE TAHASHILDAR, HANGAL, TQ.HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI AND ETC.,

¶19

¶20

NC: 2025:KHC-D:15734 WP No. 101739 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

¶25

This Court, by order dated 15.10.2025, had passed

¶26

the following direction:

¶27

“Finally, 10 days’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, showing indulgence as it was a common object that is passed. In the event objections are not complied with, as directed by the Co-ordinate Bench earlier, the petitions could be dismissed without showing any indulgence to the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, as this would be the last straw of opportunity to comply.

¶28

List this matter on 29.10.2025.

¶29

Interim order subsisting, if any, is extended till the next date of hearing.”

¶30

Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office

¶31

objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance with the office objections.

¶32

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶33

VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 208

Pandurang S/O Ramanna Tondur v. the Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandurang S/O Ramanna Tondur v. the Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Siddharth Chugh Vs Array Networks India Pvt. Ltd.

Smt. Saraswathamma Vs Smt. Rathnamma

Smt Seema Chandrashekar Vs State of Karnataka

Noorzahan Shaikh Vs State of Karnataka

Prabhavati Ganesh Pujari Vs State of Karnataka

Girija Kulkarni D/O Udupirao Vs the Principal Secretary