Chandrashekhar Ramappa Jadhav v. Smt. Sunitha W/O Chandrashekhar Jadhav
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench; NC: 2025:KHC-D:5934; WP No. 101617 of 2025 (GM-CPC); writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; dismissed as infructuous at preliminary hearing on counsel's own request (advocate on record and petitioner took a conscious decision not to seek recall or review); single-judge bench: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti Mulimani; decision dated 3 April 2025; petitioner Chandrashekhhar Ramappa Jadhav (business, Unkal, Hubballi) versus respondents Sunitha, Amith, Rohith, Baby, Govind and Harikishan Chandrashekhhar Jadhav (Hubballi, Dharwad district); counsel: Sri Santosh S. Hattikatagi for Sri Ramesh I. Zirali; no cases cited, no monetary quantum, no impugned order identified.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous (operative sentence begins at para 35 and concludes with the word 'infructuous.' at para 36); the oral submission of counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.