Dismissed¶¶30

Smt. Lakshmi Bai v. Jagadish H.S. Since Dead by

Karnataka HC16 Jan 2025WP/10147/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; WP No. 10147 of 2016 (GM-RES); Jyoti Mulimani J.; order dated 16.01.2025; petitioners absent on 27.11.2024 and 16.01.2025; advocate H.H. Shetty absent; Dilip Kumar for respondents 1 to 3.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution: the petitioners were not represented when the case was called on 16.01.2025 (nor on 27.11.2024), and it appears they are not interested in prosecuting the petition. ¶¶30

Smt. Lakshmi Bai Vs Jagadish H.S. Since Dead by — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1780 WP No. 10147 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10147 OF 2016 (GM-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. LAKSHMI BAI DEAD,

¶8

SMT. BHARATHI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D/O LATE H.R.SHET RAMA RAO, W/O SRI JAGANNATH RAO, R/AT NO.32, 10^TH CROSS, SHIVAJI ROAD, ALSO AT # 58, 2^ND CROSS, TEACHERS' LAYOUT, SIDDIVINAYAKA BLOCK, MYSORE-570 011.

¶9

…PETITIONERS

¶10

(BY SRI. H.H.SHETTY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

¶11

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

AND:

¶13

JAGADISH.H.S. SINCE DEAD BY LRS,

¶14

SMT H.J.MINNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O LATE JAGADISH.H.S., R/AT NO.32, 10^TH CROSS, SHIVAJI RAOD, N.R.MOHALLA, MYSORE-570 007.

¶15

MASTER JAYANTH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, S/O LATE JAGADISH.H.S.,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:1780 WP No. 10147 of 2016

¶18

KUM. POORVI AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,

¶19

ALL ARE R/AT NO.32, 1O CROSS, SHIVAJI ROAD, MOHALLA, MYSORE-570 007.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. DILIP KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 3)

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.

¶26

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 27.11.2024, on that day, none appeared for the petitioners. Hence, it was ordered to be listed on 16.01.2025.

¶27

The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:1780 WP No. 10147 of 2016

¶30

the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-

¶31

prosecution.

¶32

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶33

MRP

¶34