Sri. v. M Dayananda Kumar S/O v Mallikarjuna v the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC Dharwad; WP 100901/2025 (LB-RES); mandamus to restrain municipal commissioner from obstructing house construction refused; notice and lawful procedure required before action against petitioner; Articles 226 & 227; petition dismissed; Suraj Govindaraj J.; Gangavathi CMC; Town Planning Authority; Urban Development Department.
What did the court decide?
The relief sought for, namely a mandamus directing respondent No.2 not to obstruct in the construction of the house on the plot belonging to the petitioner, cannot be granted. ¶32