Disposed

Hanamantappa Sannapadiyappa Pujar v. the Management of Nwkrtc

Karnataka HC18 Sept 2025WP/100756/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition seeking interest on belated terminal benefits after accepting a joint memorandum filed by the parties, mediated through a centre, which settled on a lower interest rate and a payment deadline.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of the recorded settlement agreement requiring the respondent to pay 7% interest on belated benefits.

Hanamantappa Sannapadiyappa Pujar Vs the… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12620 WP No. 100756 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 100756 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

HANAMANTAPPA SANNAPADIYAPPA PUJAR AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED SERVICE, SHANTAGERI, GADAG.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SAROJA C. BANAKAR, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE MANAGEMENT OF NWKRTC, REPTD. BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, GADAG DIVISION, GADAG.

¶13

…RESPONDENT

¶14

Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad

¶15

(BY SRI. PRASHANT HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)

¶16

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO WRIT OF MANDAMUS OF POSITIVE NATURE, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO PAY THE INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 18% PER ANNUM ON THE BELATED PAYMENT OF TERMINAL BENEFIT. I.E. LEAVE ENCASHEMENT BENEFIT BY FIXING OUTER LIMIT AND ISSUE ANY OTHER WIT OR ORDER AS THIS HON BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING THE COST OF THE PROCEEDINGS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

¶17

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THERIN AS UNDER:

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12620 WP No. 100756 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

¶23

The matter was referred to mediation under the aegis of the Mediation centre in the light of the Mediation “For the Nation” 90 days’ drive. Mr. B.D. Hiremath was appointed as the Mediator in the present case.

¶24

It is submitted that the Mediator has successfully facilitated a settlement between the parties. Pursuant thereto, a joint memorandum has been filed, recording the terms of the compromise, which reads as under:

¶25

“1. The Petitioner has filed the above writ petition seeking a direction to the Respondents to pay interest at 14% per annum on the belated payment of terminal benefits, namely leave encashment benefits.

¶26

2. During the pendency of the above writ petition, the parties have amicably settled the issue involved, on the following terms and conditions, in order to put an end to the litigation:

¶27

a. The Management, though disputing the order, has agreed to pay interest at 7% per annum on the belated payment of leave encashment benefits for the period of delay, within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12620 WP No. 100756 of 2025

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

certified copy of the award, which the Petitioner has accepted.

¶32

b. It is further agreed that in the event of failure to pay the said interest within 8 weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order, the Respondent-Corporation shall pay interest at 9% per annum on the belated payment.

¶33

c. If the Management fails to comply with the aforesaid conditions, the Petitioner is at liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the competent Court of law for execution of this settlement.

¶34

d. The above settlement and the terms agreed upon are in accordance with law, do not offend any provision of law, and constitute a fair and reasonable settlement in the interest of both parties.

¶35

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispose of the matter in terms of the settlement recorded herein, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶36

Accepting the joint memorandum, the petition is disposed of in accordance with the settlement reached

¶37

between the parties.

¶38

¶39

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12620 WP No. 100756 of 2025

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

This Court records its appreciation for the efforts of the learned Mediator Mr. B.D. Hiremath in amicably

¶42

resolving the dispute.

¶43

Sd/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶44

VB CT:PA List No.: 4 Sl No.: 30

Hanamantappa Sannapadiyappa Pujar v. the Management of Nwkrtc

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hanamantappa Sannapadiyappa Pujar v. the Management of Nwkrtc

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Joythi Vs State of Karnataka

Canara Bank, Masur Branch Vs the Warehousing Development

Elish Vs the Deputy Commissioner

The Management of Grasim Industries Ltd. Vs the Labour Officer

Mangaladevi D/O Chandrashekar Bakare Vs the Divisional Controller

Shri Vidyadhar Vs the Management of Nwkrtc