Rajagopal Reddy v. Shri.M Dalichand
Case brief
What is this about?
Bengaluru; High Court of Karnataka; WA No. 86 of 2025 (KLR-RES); writ appeal under Section 4 Karnataka High Court Act; challenges Single Judge orders of 05.07.2024 (WP No. 3898/2024) and 14.10.2024 (RP No. 368/2024); grievance that appellants were precluded from filing objections or being heard by the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District, when deciding the representation of private respondent Shri M Dalichand (Tahsildar, Bangalore East Taluk joined as respondent 3); during appeal notice issued to appellants and objections filed; consent disposal; appellants to be heard while representation decided; liberty to parties to seek early disposal; pending IAs disposed; bench: V Kameswar Rao, Acting Chief Justice and C M Joshi, Judge; decided 12.06.2025; neutral citation NC: 2025:KHC:20203-DB.
What did the court decide?
By consent of counsel for both sides, the writ appeal and the writ petition disposed of, recording that the appellants are required to be heard by the Deputy Commissioner while deciding respondent No.1's representation; parties given liberty to request early disposal of the representation; all pending interlocutory applications disposed of.