Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Smt Nalina T Vs the Canara Bank — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Karnataka HC
2025
Smt Nalina T Vs the Canara BankSmt Nalina T v. the Canara Bank

Dismissed¶2

Smt Nalina T v. the Canara Bank

Karnataka HC21 Nov 2025WA/1850/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Writ Appeal No. 1850 of 2024 (GM-DRT); Neutral citation NC: 2025:KHC:48115-DB; decided 21.11.2025 by Division Bench of Vibhu Bakhru, Chief Justice (per) and C.M. Poonacha, J. Appellant: Smt Nalina T. Respondents: Canara Bank (Head Office, Regional Office Guwahati, Branch Aizwal), Deputy Commissioner/Asst Commissioner/Asst Director of Land Records/Tahasildars (Chikkamagaluru), and private individuals H.G. Lokesh Murthy and Nagaraju. Appeal filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against Single Judge order dated 15/11/2024 in WP No.25916/2024; dismissed as withdrawn at preliminary hearing on appellant's statement that other remedies were being pursued; no merits decided; no cases cited; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ appeal was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the appellant's counsel.

Why is it important?

On learned counsel for the appellant submitting that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn since the appellant had already taken steps for availing other remedies, the Division Bench dismissed the present writ appeal as withdrawn. No merits adjudication was made. ¶1-2

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; the writ appeal was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the appellant's counsel.

Ratio / Principle

On learned counsel for the appellant submitting that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn since the appellant had already taken steps for availing other remedies, the Division Bench dismissed the present writ appeal as withdrawn. No merits adjudication was made.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Appeal No. 1850 of 2024 (GM-DRT), High Court of Karnataka (Vibhu Bakhru, Chief Justice and C.M. Poonacha, JJ.), 21.11.2025: Dismissed as withdrawn — at the preliminary hearing stage, learned counsel for the appellant (Smt Nalina T) sought permission to withdraw the appeal against Canara Bank and other respondents, stating that the appellant had already taken steps for availing other remedies. The Bench accordingly dismissed the appeal as withdrawn without adjudication on merits. The appeal had been filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act seeking to set aside the order dated 15/11/2024 of the learned Single Judge in WP No.25916/2024.

A

1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:48115-DB WA No. 1850 of 2024

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1850 OF 2024 (GM-DRT)

BETWEEN:

SMT NALINA T W/O DR.ASHWIN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/A NO.328 PO, NERALAKERE TALUK, TARIKERE, CHIKKAMANGLURU 577 228

…APPELLANT

(BY MS. JAHNAVI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R GOULAY, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

AND:

THE CANARA BANK HEAD OFFICE REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JC ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002.

THE DEPUTY MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE CANARA BANK, CIRCLE OFFICE, PANJABARI ROAD, SIX MILE DEE BEE GRAND, GUWAHATI ASSAM-781037

THE BRANCH MANAGER CANARA BANK, H.O 2ND FLOOR,

2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:48115-DB WA No. 1850 of 2024

HC-KAR

ZODINE SQUARE, NEAR SOLOMON'S CAVE, AIZWAL, MIZORAM-796001

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577101

THE ASST.COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKKAMAGALURU 577101

THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKKAMAGALURU-577101

THE TAHASILDAR KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT 577135

THE TAHASILDAR TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577228

SRI. H.G.LOKESH MURTHY S/O GURUMALLAIAH, R/A HIREGOWJA V P, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, CHIKKAMAGALURU 577 168.

SRI. NAGARAJU S/O SRI. MAHALINGAPPA N.M MAJOR, NERALEKARE VILLAGE TARIKERETQ.,

CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577228

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA FOR R4 TO R8 SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R9)

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:48115-DB WA No. 1850 of 2024

HC-KAR

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15/11/2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.25916/2024 AND TO ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AND GRANT THE PRAYER AS SOUGHT FOR THEREIN AND ETC.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the present appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn as the appellant

has already taken steps for availing of other remedies.

In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as

withdrawn.

Sd/-

(VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

BS - List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Karnataka High Court Act4¶35

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 15/11/2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No.25916/2024, which the appellant sought to set aside via this writ appeal.¶35
Learned Single Judge, High Court of Karnataka · 15/11/2024
Prior proceeding
Writ Petition No.25916/2024 was dealt with by the learned Single Judge by order dated 15/11/2024; the present writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act was filed challenging that order and came on for preliminary hearing.¶35

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
SMT NALINA T W/O DR.ASHWIN¶11
MS. JAHNAVI
respondent
THE CANARA BANK HEAD OFFICE REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR¶16
respondent
THE DEPUTY MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE CANARA BANK¶17
respondent
THE BRANCH MANAGER CANARA BANK¶18
respondent
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT¶23
SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR
respondent
THE ASST.COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT¶24
SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR
respondent
THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS¶25
SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR
respondent
THE TAHASILDAR KADUR TALUK¶26
SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR
respondent
THE TAHASILDAR TARIKERE TALUK¶27
SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR
respondent
SRI. H.G.LOKESH MURTHY¶28
SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY
respondent
SRI. NAGARAJU S/O SRI. MAHALINGAPPA N.M¶29

Coram

AI extract

VIBHU BAKHRUauthor¶39
C.M. POONACHAmember¶46

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 21 Nov 2025 · November
Registered: 18 Dec 2024
Case no.: WA/1850/2024
CNR: KAHC010736932024
Bench: C.m. Poonacha
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: WRIT APPEAL NO. 1850 OF 2024 (GM-DRT)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from C.m. Poonacha

M/S. Kadamba Associates Vs the State of Karnataka
20 Nov 2025
Sri.Renuka Enterprises Vs Karnataka State Pollution Control Board
20 Nov 2025
Tanishqa Enterprises Vs Karnataka State Pollution Control Board
20 Nov 2025
Nainala Bhavannarayana Vs the State of Karnataka
21 Nov 2025
Smt Nirupama K C Vs the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
21 Nov 2025
M/S. Hema Sri Granites Vs the State of Karnataka
21 Nov 2025

Cite this judgement

Smt Nalina T v. the Canara Bank, WA/1850/2024 (KA), decided on 21 November 2025.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Karnataka High Court Act4

View all statutes

Procedural history2

Order dated 15/11/2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No.25916/2024, which the appellant sought to set aside via this writ appeal.Learned Single Judge, High Court of Karnataka · 15/11/2024
Writ Petition No.25916/2024 was dealt with by the learned Single Judge by order dated 15/11/2024; the present writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act was filed challenging that order and came on for preliminary hearing.

View full history

Bench / Coram

VIBHU BAKHRU and C.M. POONACHA

Parties & counsel