Sri Sathya Shantha Kumar v. Sri Junjappa D

Karnataka HC16 Jun 2025WA/184/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral judgment of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (Neutral Citation NC: 2025:KHC:20653-DB) dated 16.06.2025 in WA No. 184 of 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) by V Kameswar Rao, ACJ, and C M Joshi, J. Appeal under S. 4, Karnataka High Court Act, against Single Judge order dated 17.01.2025 in WP No. 847/2025; dismissed as withdrawn on appellant's memo dated 12.06.2025 stating the appeal had become infructuous. No precedent engaged; no substantive issue adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

In view of the appellant's memo dated 12.06.2025 praying withdrawal of the appeal as infructuous, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶¶38-39

Sri Sathya Shantha Kumar Vs Sri Junjappa D — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:20653-DB WA No. 184 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI WRIT APPEAL NO. 184 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI SATHYA SHANTHA KUMAR, S/O. LATE M. SHANTHAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO. 380, AMARAJYOTHI LAYOUT, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU-560 071.

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI SOURABH R K, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SRI JUNJAPPA D, S/O. LATE DODDMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO. 22, V. R. N. CITY, 15^TH CROSS, KANNURHALLI MAIN ROAD, SANGOLLIRAYANNANAGAR, HOSKOTE TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114.

¶16

SRI SYED DAULATH, S/O. SYED MEER, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, KARNATAKA LAYOUT, NEAR AQSA MASJID, HOSKOTE TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114.

¶17

STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:20653-DB WA No. 184 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶22

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BEERASANDRA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-572 114.

¶23

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203.

¶24

TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.01.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP No. 847/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ETC.

¶27

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶28

CORAM: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶29

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI

¶30

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶31

(PER: HON'BLE MR V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶32

Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn our

¶33

attention to the memo filed by him on 12.06.2025, which reads as under:

¶34

¶35

NC: 2025:KHC:20653-DB WA No. 184 of 2025

¶36

HC-KAR

¶37

"The Appellant herein prays leave of this Hon'ble Court of kindly allow him to withdraw this Appeal as said appeal has been infructuous in nature. Hence the Appellant herein prays before this Hon'ble court to kindly allow this memo and take this memo on record as this appeal has been withdrawn as infructuous. Kindly allow this memo, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶38