Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

B.G. Narayanswamy Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Karnataka HC
2025
B.G. Narayanswamy Vs the State of KarnatakaB.G. Narayanswamy v. the State of Karnataka

Dismissed¶75

B.G. Narayanswamy v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC24 Oct 2025WA/1564/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn on appellant's memo; Karnataka HC Division Bench (NC: 2025:KHC:42143-DB), WA No. 1564/2023 (SCST), decided 24.10.2025 per Vijaykumar A. Patil J. with Anu Sivaraman J. Withdrawal grounds: Assistant Commissioner's order in K.SC.ST/112/2006-07 passed per directions in WP Nos. 23357/2011, 25476/2011, 35808/2013, 35861/2018. Appeal lay under Section 4, Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 against orders dated 17.01.2023 in WP Nos. 35808/2013, 23357/2011, 23358/2011, 23359/2011, 23360/2011, 23361/2011, 23363/2011, 23364/2011, 23365/2011, 25476/2011, 35861/2018. Respondents: State of Karnataka Revenue Department, Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru, Assistant Commissioner Bangalore North Sub-Division, Tahsildar/Revenue Inspector/Village Accountant (Bangalore East Taluk, K R Puram/Basavanapura) and private respondents of Priyadarshini Layout, Devasandra. Advocates: Suresh K. for appellant; Mamatha Shetty, AGA for R1-R6. No precedent engaged, no issues framed, no quantum; cite only as a procedural withdrawal record.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the appeal was effectively accepted on the appellant's memo; the writ appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn, and pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration. ¶75

Why is it important?

In view of the appellant's memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal (filed because the Assistant Commissioner had passed the order in K.SC.ST/112/2006-07 as per directions in WP Nos. 23357/2011, 25476/2011, 35808/2013 and 35861/2018), the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶75

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Leave to withdraw the appeal was effectively accepted on the appellant's memo; the writ appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn, and pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration.

Ratio / Principle

In view of the appellant's memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal (filed because the Assistant Commissioner had passed the order in K.SC.ST/112/2006-07 as per directions in WP Nos. 23357/2011, 25476/2011, 35808/2013 and 35861/2018), the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Key takeaways

Pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration.ratio¶76

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Karnataka, Division Bench (Anu Sivaraman and Vijaykumar A. Patil JJ.), judgment dated 24.10.2025 delivered per Vijaykumar A. Patil J. — WA No. 1564 of 2023 (SCST): B.G. Narayanswamy v. State of Karnataka (Revenue Department) and 24 others. The appeal, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 to set aside the orders dated 17.01.2023 in WP Nos. 35808/2013, 23357/2011, 23358/2011, 23359/2011, 23360/2011, 23361/2011, 23363/2011, 23364/2011, 23365/2011, 25476/2011, 35861/2018 and etc., was taken up for orders. Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal, stating that the Assistant Commissioner had since passed the order in K.SC.ST/112/2006-07 pursuant to the directions issued in WP Nos. 23357/2011, 25476/2011, 35808/2013 and 35861/2018. In view of the memo, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and pending applications, if any, were held not to survive for consideration. No substantive issue was adjudicated; the record is of procedural value only (voluntary withdrawal).

A

1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:42143-DB WA No. 1564 of 2023

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

WRIT APPEAL NO. 1564 OF 2023 (SCST)

BETWEEN:

B.G. NARAYANSWAMY S/O GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO 2, 4TH CROSS, PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT, DEVASANDRA MAIN ROAD, K R PURAM, BANGALORE 560 006.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. SURESH K., ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER K G ROAD, BENGALURU 560001.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BENGALURU 560001.

2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:42143-DB WA No. 1564 of 2023

HC-KAR

THASILDHAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK, K R PURAM, BENGALURU 560036.

THE REVENUE INSPECTOR K R PURAM HOBLI, K R PURAM, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 560036.

THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT BASAVANAPURA VILLAGE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 560036.

SRI SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, CHIKKABASAVANAPURA K R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 560049.

G SAMPATH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O M GANESHAN, R/AT FA 470, OLD TOWNSHIP HAL COLONY, VIMANAPURA POST, BANGALORE 560017.

G GAJENDRAN AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, S/O GOVINDHAN, R/AT 8/31, SOUTH CROSS STREET, NEELSANDRA, BANGALORE 560047.

M KUPPUSWAMY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O MUNISWAMY, R/AT 170, 3RD CROSS, YOGAPPA BLOCK, V NAGENAHALLI, R T NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560032.

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:42143-DB WA No. 1564 of 2023

HC-KAR

VIPLOV KUMAR

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O BINOD KUMAR SINGH, R/AT PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT, DEVASANDRA M N ROAD, K R PURAM, BANGALORE 560006.

K YASHODAMMA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O Y S SRINIVAS R/AT PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT, DEVASANDRA MN ROAD, K R PURAM, BANGALORE 560006.

K SRINIVAS RAO AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O KONDAIAH, R/AT PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT, DEVASANDRA MN ROAD, K R PURAM, BANGALORE 560006.

H BANUMATHI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O HARIKUMAR, R/AT PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT, DEVASANDRA MN ROAD, K R PURAM, BANGALORE 560006.

R B PRABHAKAR SINGH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O RAM SINGH, R/AT NO.1, 4TH CROSS, PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT, DEVASANDRA MN ROAD, K R PURAM, BANGALORE 560006.

K SUGUNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.58/2, 8TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS, PRAKESH NAGAR, BANGALORE 560021.

PARIZAN AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O MASTHON SHAHEB,

4 -

NC: 2025:KHC:42143-DB WA No. 1564 of 2023

HC-KAR

R/AT NO.25/26, 5TH CROSS PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT DEVASANDRA MN ROAD, K R PURA, BENGALURU 560006.

THIRUMAL RAJ A S AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O SATHYANARAYANAN, R/AT NO.15, 2ND CROSS, PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT DEVASANDRA MN ROAD, K R PURA, BENGALURU 560006.

JAYA PRAKESH P S AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O LATE SHESHADRI, R/AT SRI RAMA TEMPLE, 10TH CROSS, WILSON GARDEN, BANGALORE 560027.

V PARARISWAMY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O VEERASWAMY, R/AT NO.27/1, MICHEAL PALYA, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BANGALORE 560075.

KUMARESH

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O T KUPPUSWAMY, R/AT NO.79, 2ND CROSS, MARUTHI MANDIR, SABANNA GARDEN, VIJAYA NAGAR, BANGALORE 560040.

V MEENA BAI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, W/O NAMADEV RAO, R/AT NO.195, 15TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, SUBRAMANI NAGAR, BANGALORE 560021.

5 -

NC: 2025:KHC:42143-DB WA No. 1564 of 2023

HC-KAR

N SAMAPATH AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, W/O LATE K NARASIMHALU NAIDU, R/AT NO.11, 4TH CROSS, PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT DEVASANDRA MN ROAD, K R PURA, BENGALURU 560006.

SMT. DEVAMMA

W/O LATE K SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, NO.24, 5TH CROSS, PRIYADARSHINI LAYOUT DEVASANDRA MN ROAD, K R PURA, BENGALURU 560006.

A. M. FERNANDO

SON OF JEYRAJ FERNANDO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 8/1 3^RD CROSS, MARCOM ROAD ASHOK NAGAR, BANGALORE 560025.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA FOR R1 TO R6)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.01.2023 IN THE WRIT PETITION NO. 35808/2013, 23357/2011, 23358/2011, 23359/2011, 23360/2011, 23361/2011, 23363/2011, 23364/2011, 23365/2011, 25476/2011, 35861/2018 AND ETC.,

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

6 -

NC: 2025:KHC:42143-DB WA No. 1564 of 2023

HC-KAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

seeking leave of the Court to withdrawal the appeal which

reads as under:

"The appellant prays to withdraw the above mentioned appeal as the Assistant commissioner had passed the order in K.SC.ST/112/2006-07 as per the direction issued in WP No - 23357/2011, 25476/2011, 35808/2013, 35861/2018.

In the event of the order passed by the assistant commissioner the appellant prays to withdraw the above mentioned appeal in the interest of justice and equity."

In view of the aforesaid memo, the appeal is

dismissed as withdrawn.

Pending applications, if any, do not survive for

consideration.

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN)

JUDGE

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

ABK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Karnataka High Court Act, 1961Section 4¶60

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order(s) dated 17.01.2023 in Writ Petition Nos. 35808/2013, 23357/2011, 23358/2011, 23359/2011, 23360/2011, 23361/2011, 23363/2011, 23364/2011, 23365/2011, 25476/2011, 35861/2018 'and etc.', which this writ appeal prayed to set aside.¶60
High Court of Karnataka (orders in the writ petitions) · 17.01.2023
Prior proceeding
Writ Appeal No. 1564 of 2023 (SCST) was filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 praying to allow the appeal and set aside the orders dated 17.01.2023 in the listed writ petitions.¶60
Prior proceeding
At the orders stage, learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal, stating that the Assistant Commissioner had passed the order in K.SC.ST/112/2006-07 pursuant to directions issued in WP Nos. 23357/2011, 25476/2011, 35808/2013 and 35861/2018.¶72

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
B.G. Narayanswamy (S/o Gopalappa)¶12
Suresh K.
respondent
The State of Karnataka, Revenue Department, rep. by its Secretary¶17
Mamatha Shetty
respondent
The Deputy Commissioner¶18
respondent
Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore North Sub-Division¶19
respondent
Thasildhar, Bangalore East Taluk¶23
respondent
Revenue Inspector, K R Puram Hobli¶24
respondent
Village Accountant, Basavanapura Village¶25
respondent
Sri Subramani¶26
respondent
G Sampath¶27
respondent
G Gajendran¶28
respondent
M Kuppuswamy¶29
respondent
Viplov Kumar¶33
respondent
K Yashodamma¶34
respondent
K Srinivas Rao¶35
respondent
H Banumathi¶36
respondent
R B Prabhakar Singh¶37
respondent
K Suguna¶38
respondent
Parizan¶39
respondent
Thirumal Raj A S¶44
respondent
Jaya Prakesh P S¶45
respondent
V Parariswamy¶46
respondent
Kumaresh¶48
respondent
V Meena Bai¶49
respondent
N Samapath¶53
respondent
Smt. Devamma¶55
respondent
A. M. Fernando¶57

Coram

AI extract

Anu Sivaramanmember¶7
Vijaykumar A. Patilauthor¶68

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 24 Oct 2025 · October
Registered: 16 Dec 2023
Case no.: WA/1564/2023
CNR: KAHC010671492023
Bench: Anu Sivaraman Vijaykumar A. Patil
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: Writ Appeal (SCST)

All orders in this case

2 orders share this CNR

21 Oct 2024Order 1 · S.g.pandit Ramachandra D. Huddar
24 Oct 2025Order 2 — this page · Anu Sivaraman Vijaykumar A. Patil

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Anu Sivaraman Vijaykumar A. Patil

V T Banu Vs Pankaj Kumar Pande
23 Oct 2025
K Nanjundegowda Vs M/S Omkar Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
23 Oct 2025
The Directorate of Medical Education Vs Sri Srinivas B
23 Oct 2025
Mr Akbar Sharief Vs Mr Subhan Sharief
24 Oct 2025
Smt Gayathri N Vs State of Karnataka
24 Oct 2025
Sri. Arun Kumar S H Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer
24 Oct 2025

Cite this judgement

B.G. Narayanswamy v. the State of Karnataka, WA/1564/2023 (KA), decided on 24 October 2025.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Karnataka High Court Act, 1961Section 4

View all statutes

Procedural history3

Order(s) dated 17.01.2023 in Writ Petition Nos. 35808/2013, 23357/2011, 23358/2011, 23359/2011, 23360/2011, 23361/2011, 23363/2011, 23364/2011, 23365/2011, 25476/2011, 35861/2018 'and etc.', which this writ appeal prayed to set aside.High Court of Karnataka (orders in the writ petitions) · 17.01.2023
Writ Appeal No. 1564 of 2023 (SCST) was filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 praying to allow the appeal and set aside the orders dated 17.01.2023 in the listed writ petitions.
At the orders stage, learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw the appeal, stating that the Assistant Commissioner had passed the order in K.SC.ST/112/2006-07 pursuant to directions issued in WP Nos. 23357/2011, 25476/2011, 35808/2013 and 35861/2018.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Anu Sivaraman and Vijaykumar A. Patil

Parties & counsel