Disposed¶33

M/S Excel Sports v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC28 Jan 2025WA/1438/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Excel Sports No. 1 v. State of Karnataka (Minority Welfare Department/Directorate of Minorities) — WA No. 1438 of 2024 (GM-TEN), High Court of Karnataka, decided 28.01.2025 (N. V. Anjaria CJ and M. I. Arun J). Appeal challenging single Judge's order dated 13.09.2024 in WP No. 16239/2024 (GM-TEN); disposed of as not surviving following Government Order dated 24.09.2024 produced by respondent No. 4's counsel; pending interlocutory applications also disposed. Statute: Section 4, Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. No case citations, no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

Since a Government Order dated 24.09.2024 was produced showing the appeal would not survive, and counsel for the appellant could not dispute that position, the writ appeal stands disposed of as not surviving. ¶33

M/S Excel Sports Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:3838-DB WA No. 1438 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. N.V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I. ARUN WRIT APPEAL NO. 1438 OF 2024 (GM-TEN)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S. EXCEL SPORTS NO.1, MAJESTIC CIRCLE (NEAR ARYA BHAVAN SWEETS) BENGALURU-560 009 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI RAJENDRA SINGH KHANUJA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS (SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP UNDER THE SHOPS AND ESTABLISHMENT ACT)

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

Digitally signed by PRABHAKAR SWETHA KRISHNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

(BY SRI ROHITH V R, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. UDITA RAMESH, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY MINORITY WELFARE DEPARTMENT DIRECTORATE OF MINORITIES M.S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001

¶15

¶16

NC: 2025:KHC:3838-DB WA No. 1438 of 2024

¶17

THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF MINORITIES MAULANA ABDUL KALAM AZAD BHAVAN VASANTH NAGAR

¶18

BENGALURU-560 001

¶19

SRI SOURI RAJAN K CGECCSL, KENDRIYA BHANDAR COMMUNITY CENTER CPWD QUARTERS 1^ST MAIN ROAD, A.K. COLONY DOMLUR 1^ST STAGE BENGALURU-560 071

¶20

SRI ANKIT PANKAJ THAKKAR B-464, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI-580 026

¶21

THE MEMBER OF EVALUATION COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF MINORITIES MAULANA ABDUL KALAM AZAD BHAVAN NO.16C, MILLERS TANK BED AREA VASANTHNAGAR BENGALURU-560 052

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI K S HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & 2; MS. A V ANJANA, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. RAKSHITHA D J, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-4)

¶24

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 13.09.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.16239 /2024 (GM-TEN).

¶25

¶26

NC: 2025:KHC:3838-DB WA No. 1438 of 2024

¶27

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶28

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

¶29

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶30

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)

¶31

Learned advocate Ms. A.V. Anjana for learned advocate Smt. D.J. Rakshitha for respondent No.4 files the memo producing the copy of the Government Order dated 24.09.2024 and states that in view of the said Government Order, the appeal will not survive.

¶32

Learned advocate Mr. V.R. Rohith appearing through Video Conference on behalf of learned advocate Smt. Udita Ramesh for the appellant could not dispute the aforesaid position.

¶33