Dismissed¶32

Sri Gopal v. Kumari Prema B S

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2025WA/1378/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WA No.1378 of 2023 (LR); writ appeal dismissed for non-compliance of office objections after seventh listing; condonation of delay of 106 days application returned with office objections; counsel unable to contact appellant; impugned order dated 12.06.2023 in WP No.9460/2015 (LR-RES); filed under Section 4, Karnataka High Court Act, 1961; judgment per Anu Sivaraman J. with K.Manmadha Rao J.; no substantive issues decided; no costs or amounts awarded.

What did the court decide?

Since the office objections were not complied with despite several opportunities (the appeal having been listed for the seventh time) and learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he was unable to contact the appellant, the writ appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. ¶32

Sri Gopal Vs Kumari Prema B S — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:18612-DB WA No. 1378 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO. 1378 OF 2023 (LR)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. GOPAL S/O JAVARADASAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT. BAIRAPURA CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-577228

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI. MOHAN REDDY H. SAWKAR, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

KUMARI. PREMA B.S. D/O SUBBEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE R/AT. KURTHIKERE CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-577 101

¶15

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU SUB-DIVISION CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 101

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. G.S. ARUN, AGA FOR R2)

¶18

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18612-DB WA No. 1378 of 2023

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 12.06.2023 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP No.9460/2015 (LR-RES) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION AND GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEF'S AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER.

¶21

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

¶23

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶24

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶25

The appeal is listed for orders for non-compliance of

¶26

office objections for the seventh time. The interlocutory application filed for condonation of delay of 106 days in filing the appeal has also been returned with office objections. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he is unable to contact the appellant.

¶27