Smt Boramma v. Smt Rukmini
Case brief
What is this about?
RSA No. 93 of 2022 (SP), Karnataka High Court, decided 20.08.2025 by V Srishananda J.; dismissed for non-prosecution for failure to comply office objections and non-payment of Rs. 1,000 cost imposed by order dated 05.01.2024; filed under Section 100 CPC against appellate decree dated 01.04.2021 in R.A.No.09/2018 (Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Nanjangud) which had set aside trial decree dated 28.03.2018 in O.S.No.76/2010; no merits adjudicated; no cases cited.
What did the court decide?
The Regular Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution because, although the appeal was pending since 2022 solely for rectification of office objections and a week's time had been granted by order dated 05.01.2024 on payment of cost of `1,000/-, neither the office objections were complied with nor the cost paid despite sufficient time. ¶27