Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Venkategowda Vs Smt B S Anasuya — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Karnataka HC
2025
Venkategowda Vs Smt B S AnasuyaVenkategowda v. Smt B S Anasuya

Dismissed¶47

Venkategowda v. Smt B S Anasuya

Karnataka HC20 Jun 2025RSA/522/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; NC: 2025:KHC:21548; Regular Second Appeal No. 522 of 2013 (SP); decided 20 June 2025 by Hon'ble Mr Justice Ashok S. Kinagi. Appellant: Venkategowda s/o late Venkategowda (counsel: Sri Mallikarjun C Basareddy); respondents include Smt B. S. Anasuya and the legal representatives (B. S. Harish, Nagaraja, Shashikantha @ Shashi, Manjula) of deceased B. P. Satyanarayan Shetty, among others. Appeal under Sec. 100 CPC against judgment and decree dated 21.01.2013 in R.A. No. 125/2010, Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Bhadravathi, dismissing the appeal and confirming order dated 29.03.2010 on I.A. No. 1 in E.P. No. 26/91, Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi. Disposition: appeal dismissed as abated - appellant died during Covid-19 and legal representatives were not brought on record. No merits adjudicated; no precedent cited; no monetary amount involved.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed as abated because the appellant died during the period of Covid-19 and his legal representatives have not filed an application to come on record. ¶47

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the regular second appeal stands abated on the death of the appellant where his legal representatives have not filed an application to come on record.

Court's answer

The appeal is dismissed as abated because the appellant died during the period of Covid-19 and his legal representatives have not filed an application to come on record.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Regular Second Appeal No. 522 of 2013 under Sec. 100 CPC by Venkategowda against the judgment and decree dated 21.01.2013 in R.A. No. 125/2010 (Fast Track Court, Bhadravathi), which had dismissed his first appeal and confirmed the order dated 29.03.2010 on I.A. No. 1 in E.P. No. 26/91 (Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi). Before any adjudication on merits, counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the appellant died during the period of Covid-19 and his legal representatives had not filed an application to come on record. The High Court (Ashok S. Kinagi, J.), by judgment dated 20.06.2025, dismissed the appeal as abated. No substantive issue was decided and no precedent was cited or discussed.

A

NC: 2025:KHC:21548 RSA No. 522 of 2013

1 -

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 522 OF 2013 (SP)

BETWEEN:

VENKATEGOWDA S/O LATE VENKATEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O HOSUE NO.9 BYADRAHALLI, OPP. RAMAKRISHNA, OMKAR ASHRAM, APPANNAPPA EXTENSION, BANALORE CITY-560086.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN C BASAREDDY., ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka

SMT B. S. ANASUYA W/O SATYANARAYANA SHETTY, MAJOR, R/O NEAR MADAVACHAR CIRCLE, TARIKERE ROAD, OLD TOWN, BHADRAVATHI-577301.

B. P. SATYANARAYAN SHETTY DEAD BY HIS LR'S

B. S. HARISH.

2(a) S/O B. P. SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY, AGED 46 YEARS,

2(b) NAGARAJA S/O B. P. SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:21548 RSA No. 522 of 2013

HC-KAR

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

2(c) SHASHIKANTHA @ SHASHI S/O B. P. SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

2(d) MANJULA W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

ALL ARE RESIDENT OF HARISH BAKERY, TARIKERE ROAD, MADAVACHAR CIRCLE, BHADRAVATHI-577301.

SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R./O KAGEHALLA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI-577301.

YALLAKKI GOWDA S/O NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O KAGEHALL VILLAE, R/O SRIRAMANAGARA, BHADRAVATHI-577301.

SMT. BHAGYA LAKSHMI, W/O. KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O SRIRAMANAGARA, BHADRAVATHI-577301.

SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O HEBBANDI VILLGE,

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:21548 RSA No. 522 of 2013

HC-KAR

BHADRAVATHI-577301.

JAYARAM S/O NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O KAGEHALLA, BHADRAVATHI-577301.

SMT SUJATHA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O SRI RAMANAGARA, BHADRAVATHI-577301.

SMT. TUALSI @ MAHALAXMI, W/O PRASHANTHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YERS, R/O ARASIKERE, ARASIKERE TALUK-573-201.

SMT GAYATHRI W/O LATE VENKATESHA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O KAGEHALLA, BHADARVATHI TALUK-577301.

…RESPONDENTS (R1, R2(A), R2(C), R4, R5, R6, R8 ARE SERVED)

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.01.2013 PASSED IN RA NO.125/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT, BHADRAVATHI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 29.03.2010 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN E.P. NO.26/91 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., BHADRAVATHI.

4 -

NC: 2025:KHC:21548 RSA No. 522 of 2013

HC-KAR

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for appellant filed a memo stating that appellant died during the period of Covid-19 and legal representatives have not filed application to come on record. Hence, appeal is abated.

The memo placed on record.

The appeal is dismissed as abated .

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

LDC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the regular second appeal stands abated on the death of the appellant where his legal representatives have not filed an application to come on record.medium confidence¶45
The court held
The appeal is dismissed as abated because the appellant died during the period of Covid-19 and his legal representatives have not filed an application to come on record.ratio¶47

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Civil ProcedureSection 100¶37

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Judgment and decree dated 21.01.2013 passed in R.A. No. 125/2010 by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Bhadravathi, dismissing the first appeal and confirming the order dated 29.03.2010 passed on I.A. No. 1 in E.P. No. 26/91.¶37
Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Bhadravathi · 21.01.2013
Prior proceeding
Underlying order dated 29.03.2010 passed on I.A. No. 1 in E.P. No. 26/91 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi, which was confirmed by the impugned first-appeal decree.¶37
Prior proceeding
During pendency of this RSA, learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the appellant died during the period of Covid-19 and his legal representatives had not filed an application to come on record; hence the appeal stood abated.¶45

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
VENKATEGOWDA S/O LATE VENKATEGOWDA¶9
Mallikarjun C Basareddy
respondent
SMT B. S. ANASUYA W/O SATYANARAYANA SHETTY¶14
respondent
B. S. HARISH S/O B. P. SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY (LR 2(a) of deceased R.2)¶16
respondent
NAGARAJA S/O B. P. SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY (LR 2(b) of deceased R.2)¶18
respondent
SHASHIKANTHA @ SHASHI S/O B. P. SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY (LR 2(c) of deceased R.2)¶22
respondent
MANJULA W/O MANJUNATH (LR 2(d) of deceased R.2)¶23
respondent
SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH¶25
respondent
YALLAKKI GOWDA S/O NARASIMHAIAH¶26
respondent
SMT. BHAGYA LAKSHMI W/O. KRISHNEGOWDA¶27
respondent
SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O RAVIKUMAR¶28
respondent
JAYARAM S/O NARASIMHAIAH¶32
respondent
SMT SUJATHA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA¶33
respondent
SMT. TUALSI @ MAHALAXMI W/O PRASHANTHA¶34
respondent
SMT GAYATHRI W/O LATE VENKATESHA¶35

Coram

AI extract

Ashok S. Kinagiauthor¶43

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 20 Jun 2025 · June
Registered: 18 Mar 2013
Case no.: RSA/522/2013
CNR: KAHC010506662013
Bench: Ashok S.kinagi
Disposal: Abated
Case type: RSA

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Ashok S.kinagi

Smt. Jayalakshmamma Vs Smt Rathnamma
19 Jun 2025
M/S Bvl Building Solutions Vs M/S Ithaca Estates Pvt. Ltd.
19 Jun 2025
M/S Kids Clinic India Ltd. Vs Smt. Ritika Jain
19 Jun 2025
M/S Anupama Coffee Links Vs Sri Y S Purnahandra
20 Jun 2025
Sri Venkataramaiah Vs Sri T Sreenivas
20 Jun 2025
The Senior Assistant Director of Horticulture Vs Sri.K.E. Gangadharappa
20 Jun 2025

Cite this judgement

Venkategowda v. Smt B S Anasuya, RSA/522/2013 (KA), decided on 20 June 2025.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Civil ProcedureSection 100

View all statutes

Procedural history3

Judgment and decree dated 21.01.2013 passed in R.A. No. 125/2010 by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Bhadravathi, dismissing the first appeal and confirming the order dated 29.03.2010 passed on I.A. No. 1 in E.P. No. 26/91.Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Bhadravathi · 21.01.2013
Underlying order dated 29.03.2010 passed on I.A. No. 1 in E.P. No. 26/91 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi, which was confirmed by the impugned first-appeal decree.
During pendency of this RSA, learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the appellant died during the period of Covid-19 and his legal representatives had not filed an application to come on record; hence the appeal stood abated.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Ashok S. Kinagi

Parties & counsel