Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

M/S Priyanka Products Vs the Managing Director — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Karnataka HC
2025
M/S Priyanka Products Vs the Managing DirectorM/S Priyanka Products v. the Managing Director

Disposed¶42

M/S Priyanka Products v. the Managing Director

Karnataka HC25 Sept 2025RSA/294/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; RSA No. 294 of 2012 (Regular Second Appeal DEC/INJ) under Section 100 CPC; disposed by compromise petition; parties: M/s Priyanka Products (plaintiff/appellant), Managing Director KSSIDC, Sethuraman Chief Manager KSSIDC, Nagesh Londa / M/s.Londe Botting Co.; underlying matters O.S.No.245/1995 (IV Additional Judge Jr.Dn., Mysuru) and R.A.No.69/2002 (Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru); documents: KSSIDC letters 17.11.2023 and 02.07.2024, deed of partition 12.03.2024, lease-cum-sale agreement 04.10.2024, JS Associates letter 04.10.2024, joint affidavit; decrees of courts below modified per compromise; Registry to draw decree; Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur; decided 25.09.2025; no cases cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

The Regular Second Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition; the trial court decree in O.S.No.245/1995 and the first appellate decree in R.A.No.69/2002 stand modified to the extent of the terms and conditions of the compromise petition; Registry directed to draw the decree as per the compromise petition, the compromise petition and joint affidavit forming part of the Decree.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

The Regular Second Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition; the trial court decree in O.S.No.245/1995 and the first appellate decree in R.A.No.69/2002 stand modified to the extent of the terms and conditions of the compromise petition; Registry directed to draw the decree as per the compromise petition, the compromise petition and joint affidavit forming part of the Decree.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Second Appeal (DEC/INJ) under Section 100 CPC by plaintiff M/s Priyanka Products against the decree of the Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru in R.A.No.69/2002 dated 17.11.2011 dismissing its appeal and confirming dismissal of its suit in O.S.No.245/1995. During pendency, the parties (appellant; KSSIDC through its Assistant General Manager Smt.Vedavathi T.; and respondent No.3) entered into an amicable settlement reduced to a written compromise petition filed in Open Court, appended with KSSIDC letters dated 17.11.2023 and 02.07.2024, deed of partition dated 12.03.2024, lease-cum-sale agreement approved by KSSIDC dated 04.10.2024, letter from JS Associates dated 04.10.2024, and a joint affidavit. On enquiry the Court found the compromise voluntary, without force or coercion. Holding: the appeal was disposed of in terms of the compromise petition; the decrees of both courts below were modified to the extent of the compromise terms; and the Registry was directed to draw the decree incorporating the compromise petition and joint affidavit as part of the Decree. No substantive issue was adjudicated; no precedent was cited.

A

1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:39107 RSA No. 294 of 2012

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.294 OF 2012 (DEC/INJ)

BETWEEN:

M/S PRIYANKA PRODUCTS C-189, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE YADAVAGIRI, MYSORE REP. BY ITS PROPRIETRIX SMT.JAMBAVATHI SRIDHAR W/O.SRI V.SRIDHAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS THROUGH GPA HOLDER SRI V.SRIDHAR R/AT NO.11, 5^TH MAIN PARAMAHAMSA ROAD YADAVAGIRI MYSURU-570 020

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI O.SHIVARAMA BHAT, ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSSIDC, RAJAJINAGAR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BENGALURU-560 010

SRI SETHURAMAN CHIEF MANAGER KSSIDC, YADAVAGIRI MYSORE-20

SRI NAGESH LONDA MAJOR M/S.LONDE BOTTING CO. SHED NO.183, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:39107 RSA No. 294 of 2012

HC-KAR

YADAVAGIRI MYSURU-20

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.MANJULA N.TEJASWI, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI VEERABHADRA SWAMY H.P., ADVOCATE FOR C/R-3; R-2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.11.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.69/2002 BY THE JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.01.2002 PASSED IN O.S.NO.245/1995 BY IV ADDITIONAL JUDGE (JR.DN.), MYSURU.

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

ORAL JUDGMENT

This is an appeal preferred by the plaintiff, aggrieved

by the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2022 passed in O.S.No.245/1995 by IV Additional I Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Mysuru dismissing the suit of the plaintiff, which is affirmed by the judgment and decree dated 17.1.2011 passed in R.A.No.69/2002 by the Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru.

3 -

NC: 2025:KHC:39107 RSA No. 294 of 2012

HC-KAR

During pendency of these proceedings, the parties have amicably entered into a settlement and have put the

same in writing by way of compromise petition, wherein the terms and conditions are enumerated in para-6(i) to (iv).

The appellant, Smt.Vedavathi T. - the Assistant General Manager of K.S.S.I.D.C. Limited-respondent Nos.1 and 2, Mysuru Division and respondent No.3 are physically present before the Court.

The parties have been enquired by this Court with regard to the terms and conditions of the compromise petition entered into by them today and filed in the Open Court. All the parties agreed to the terms and conditions of the compromise petition entered into by them and they submit that there is no force, coercion, ill-will in executing

this compromise petition and they have signed the same out of their own will and volition, without any force or coercion.

4 -

NC: 2025:KHC:39107 RSA No. 294 of 2012

HC-KAR

Under the circumstances, the compromise petition is appended with the documents viz., letter from KSSIDC dated 17.11.2023, deed of partition dated 12.03.2024, another letter from KSSIDC dated 02.07.2024, lease-cumsale agreement approved by KSSIDC dated 04.10.2024 and letter from JS Associates to KSSIDC dated 04.10.2024 along with the joint affidavit filed by appellant and respondent No.3-private party. The same are placed on record.

In view of the settlement agreed by way of compromise petition between the parties, the appeal will have to be disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. It is also agreed that the parties will abide by the terms and conditions of the compromise petition.

Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

i) This Regular Second Appeal stands disposed

of in terms of the compromise petition;

5 -

NC: 2025:KHC:39107 RSA No. 294 of 2012

HC-KAR

ii) The judgment and decree dated 25.01.2022 passed in O.S.No.245/1995 by IV Additional I Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Mysuru and the judgment and decree dated 17.1.2011 passed in R.A.No.69/2002 by the Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru stands modified to the extent of the terms and conditions of the compromise petition entered into by the parties herein;

iii) Registry is directed to draw the decree as per the terms set out in the compromise petition. The compromise petition and the joint affidavit shall be part of the Decree.

Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE

LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Civil ProcedureSection 100¶21

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Judgment and decree dated 17.11.2011 passed in R.A.No.69/2002 by the Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru, dismissing the first appeal and confirming the trial court decree in O.S.No.245/1995; challenged by the plaintiff-appellant under Section 100 CPC.¶21
Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru · 17.11.2011
Prior proceeding
Trial court: suit of the plaintiff in O.S.No.245/1995 dismissed by judgment and decree dated 25.01.2002 by IV Additional Judge (Jr.Dn.), Mysuru.¶21
Prior proceeding
First appeal R.A.No.69/2002 decided by the Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru on 17.11.2011, dismissing the plaintiff's appeal (see impugned order).¶26
Prior proceeding
During pendency of the second appeal, the parties amicably settled and filed a written compromise petition in Open Court, supported by documents (KSSIDC letters dated 17.11.2023 and 02.07.2024, deed of partition dated 12.03.2024, lease-cum-sale agreement approved by KSSIDC dated 04.10.2024, letter from JS Associates dated 04.10.2024) and a joint affidavit of the appellant and respondent No.3.¶39

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
M/S PRIYANKA PRODUCTS C-189, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE YADAVAGIRI, MYSORE REP. BY ITS PROPRIETRIX SMT.JAMBAVATHI SRIDHAR W/O.SRI V.SRIDHAR THROUGH GPA HOLDER SRI V.SRIDHAR¶7
O.SHIVARAMA BHAT
respondent
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSSIDC, RAJAJINAGAR INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BENGALURU-560 010¶12
MANJULA N.TEJASWI
respondent
SRI SETHURAMAN CHIEF MANAGER KSSIDC, YADAVAGIRI MYSORE-20¶20
respondent
SRI NAGESH LONDA MAJOR M/S.LONDE BOTTING CO. SHED NO.183, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE YADAVAGIRI MYSURU-20¶14
VEERABHADRA SWAMY H.P.

Coram

AI extract

PRADEEP SINGH YERURauthor¶23

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 25 Sept 2025 · September
Registered: 14 Feb 2012
Case no.: RSA/294/2012
CNR: KAHC010516572012
Bench: Pradeep Singh Yerur
Disposal: DISPOSED
Case type: REGULAR SECOND APPEAL (DEC/INJ)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Pradeep Singh Yerur

Hanamanta Somanakatti Vs the Managing Director
24 Sept 2025
The Superintendent of Central Excise Vs Sri G Ramachandra G P
24 Sept 2025
The Divisional Controller Vs Sri Babu D
24 Sept 2025
Sri. Shivakumar. N Vs the State of Karnataka
25 Sept 2025
The Warden Govt Gents Medical College Vs Sri. Subba
25 Sept 2025
Sonadhar Mourya Vs the Central Silk Board
25 Sept 2025

Cite this judgement

M/S Priyanka Products v. the Managing Director, RSA/294/2012 (KA), decided on 25 September 2025.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Civil ProcedureSection 100

View all statutes

Procedural history4

Judgment and decree dated 17.11.2011 passed in R.A.No.69/2002 by the Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru, dismissing the first appeal and confirming the trial court decree in O.S.No.245/1995; challenged by the plaintiff-appellant under Section 100 CPC.Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru · 17.11.2011
Trial court: suit of the plaintiff in O.S.No.245/1995 dismissed by judgment and decree dated 25.01.2002 by IV Additional Judge (Jr.Dn.), Mysuru.
First appeal R.A.No.69/2002 decided by the Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mysuru on 17.11.2011, dismissing the plaintiff's appeal (see impugned order).

View full history

Bench / Coram

PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

Parties & counsel