B G Nagaraja v. Smt Ratnamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru, oral judgment dated 05-06-2025 by Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde. B.G. Nagaraja (appellant; counsel G.C. Shanmukha) v. Smt. Ratnamma (respondent; counsel D.P. Mahesh). RSA No. 260 of 2008 (Dec), filed under Section 100 CPC against the R.A.No.158/2005 judgment and decree dated 20.8.2007 of the I Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Davanagere, confirming the O.S.No.149/91 judgment and decree dated 18.2.2005 of the Prl. Civil Judge (S.Rdn) and JMFC, Channagiri. Dismissed for non-prosecution: no representation despite personal service of notice; no adjournment granted. No substantive issues adjudicated; no precedents cited; no monetary amounts involved.
What did the court decide?
The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because there was no representation for the appellant despite personal service of court notice, and no grounds existed to adjourn the matter.