Dismissed¶41

Manjulamma v. Rathnamma

Karnataka HC11 Jun 2025RSA/259/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru, NC: 2025:KHC:20112; RSA No. 259 of 2014 (PAR); appellant Manjulamma w/o Raju vs respondents incl. Rathnamma, Ramya, Ningamma, Shankaregowda, Shivaramegowda, Gowramma, Parasetty; filed u/s 100 CPC challenging decree dtd 25.7.2012 in RA 51/2009 (Sr. Civil Judge & JMFC K.R.Pet) modifying decree dtd 27.8.2009 in OS 72/2000 (CJ Jr.Dn & JMFC Krishnarajapete); appeal against R3 & R5 dismissed v/o 31.08.2016; appellant's advocate Chandrashekar H B absent; dismissed FOR NON-PROSECUTION on 11.06.2025 by Justice Ashok S. Kinagi (oral judgment); no merits decided, no cases or amounts cited.

What did the court decide?

The appeal, pending since 2014, is dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear despite time being granted and appears not interested in prosecuting the appeal. ¶41

Manjulamma Vs Rathnamma — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:20112 RSA No. 259 of 2014

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶8

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 259 OF 2014 (PAR)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

MANJULAMMA W/O RAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/O HARIHARA PURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI K R PET TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571438

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR H B., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)

¶13

Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

AND:

¶15

RATHNAMMA

¶16

W/O LATE MANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶17

RAMYA

¶18

D/O LATE MANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶19

BOTH ARE R/O HOSAHOLALU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, K R PETE TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571438

¶20

NINGAMMA W/O LATE RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

¶21

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:20112 RSA No. 259 of 2014

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

SHANKAREGOWDA S/O LATE RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

¶24

SHIVARAMEGOWDA S/O LATE RAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

¶25

RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 ARE R/O HOSAHOLALU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, K R PETE TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571438

¶26

SMT GOWRAMMA D/O RAMEGOWDA W/O CHANDREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O CHIKKAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, K R PET TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571438

¶27

7. PARVASETTY

¶28

S/O MALLAPPA SETTY R/O HOSAHOLALU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, K R PETE TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571438

¶29

…RESPONDENTS

¶30

(BY SRI. S MRUTHYUNJAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R4 R6 & R7 ARE SERVED

¶31

V/O DATED 31.08.2016 APPEAL AGAINST R3 & R5 IS DISMISSED)

¶32

THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 25.7.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.51/2009 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, K.R.PET, MODIFYING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 27.8.2009 PASSED IN OS.NO.72/2000 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJAPETE.

¶33

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:20112 RSA No. 259 of 2014

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶36

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶37

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶38

The matter was listed on 05.06.2025. Case called

¶39

twice, none appeared for the appellant and it was made clear that a week’s time was granted. In case if there was no representation on behalf of the appellant on the next date of hearing, appropriate order will be passed. Even

¶40

today, case called. None appears for the appellant.

¶41

As the appeal is of the year 2014, it seems that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶42

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶43

SKS

Manjulamma v. Rathnamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjulamma v. Rathnamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Maddappa Vs Sri Narayana

Smt Malathiyamma Vs S Sreenivas Yadiyal

P Nandakumar Rao Vs Vinodkumar Rao

Krishnegowda Vs Sri H K Basavaraju

Sri. Murigeppa Vs Jayappa

R Patric Vs Chandru