Smt. Yashodamma v. Smt. Rathnamma
Case brief
What is this about?
[NC: 2025:KHC:49042] RSA No. 2041 of 2013 | High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru | Ashok S. Kinagi J. (oral judgment) | decided 21-11-2025 | Second appeal by obstructer against rejection of her Order XXI Rule 97 objection in execution of a specific-performance decree (O.S.No.241/1991; E.P.No.13/2004; R.A.No.4/2011) | Court records rival memos resolving a property-number dispute: appellant disclaims interest in No. 711/711/688; respondent Nos.1-3 (heirs of Late Byrappa) disclaim any claim over the obstructer's property under sale deed Ex.P9 dated 29.08.1991 (common vendor Chikkamalleshappa) | Appeal and pending IAs disposed of without merits adjudication; no costs quantified.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of on the basis of the parties' memos: the appellant/obstructer disclaims all right, title or interest in property bearing No. 711/711/688, and respondent Nos.1-3/decree holders undertake not to claim the obstructer's property conveyed under registered sale deed Ex.P9 dated 29.08.1991; pending IAs do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.