Smt. Thimmakka v. H v Raju
Case brief
What is this about?
NC: 2025:KHC:54414 — Karnataka HC (single judge, Dr. Justice K. Manmadha Rao), 18-12-2025: RSA No. 178 of 2016 (S.100 CPC), Kolar — appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; office objections not complied; appellant's counsel (Sri Saravana S.) filed retirement memo and was absent; counsel for R2/R4 present. Challenge was to first-appellate judgment/decree dated 28.10.2015 in R.A. No. 121/2012 (II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Kolar) confirming decree dated 24.09.2012 in O.S. No. 199/2009 (III Addl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Kolar). No merits adjudicated, no cases cited, no quantum. Parties: Smt. Thimmakka v. H.V. Raju, Smt. M. Rajeshwari, H.V. Ravindra and Kum. Deepthi.
What did the court decide?
The regular second appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution, office objections having remained uncomplied and there being no representation on behalf of the appellant despite sufficient opportunities.