Dismissed¶40

Meenakshi K v. Moidin Beary

Karnataka HC16 Jul 2025RSA/171/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, RSA No. 171 of 2013 (INJ), decided 16 July 2025, coram Ashok S.Kinagi (oral judgment); Meenakshi K, Purandara K, Harish K and Yashvantha K (legal representatives of K.Ananda Rao) v. Moidin Beary, Tahasildar Bantwal and Deputy Commissioner D.K. District; RSA under S. 100 CPC against judgment & decree dtd 27.8.2012 in R.A.No.12/2011 (Sr. Civil Judge & JMFC, Bantwal) confirming decree dtd 14.1.2011 in O.S.No.79/2003 (Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Bantwal); counsel filed withdrawal memo seeking liberty to pursue application before revenue authorities; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty; no cases cited, no merits decided, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to pursue the application before the revenue authorities. ¶40

Meenakshi K Vs Moidin Beary — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:27062 RSA No. 171 of 2013

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 171 OF 2013 (INJ)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MEENAKSHI K W/O K.ANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

¶10

PURANDARA. K. S/O K.ANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

¶11

HARISH.K. S/O K.ANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

¶12

Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

YASHVANTHA.K. S/O K.ANANDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

¶14

All ARE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF K.ANANDA RAO, R/O KUDUMBLADI HOUSE, KEDILA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT-574220.

¶15

…APPELLANTS

¶16

(BY SRI. GANAPATHI S SHASTRI.,ADVOCATE)

¶17

AND:

¶18

MOIDIN BEARY

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:27062 RSA No. 171 of 2013

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

S/O ARABI BEARY, MAJOR,

¶22

R/O KUDUMBLADI HOUSE, KEDILA VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT.-574220.

¶23

TAHASILDAR

¶24

BANTWAL,

¶25

BANTWAL TALUK OFFICE, D.K.DISTRICT-574220.

¶26

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D.K.DISTRICT.

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

(BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, HIGH COURT GOVT PLEADER FOR R2 & R3., SRI. PRASANNA V.R, ADVOCATE FOR R1)

¶29

THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 27.8.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.12/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SR. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., BANTWAL, D.K, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 14.1.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.79/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., BANTWAL, D.K.

¶30

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶31

¶32

NC: 2025:KHC:27062 RSA No. 171 of 2013

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶35

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶36