D Onkarappa v. Onkaramma
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court RSA 1683/2022 disposed by compromise petition (14.03.2025, Justice Ashok S. Kinagi); specific performance of agreement to sell dated 24.11.2014; Sy.No.4/48 and Sy.No.4/40, Siddagondanahalli Village, Mathodu Hobli, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga; sale consideration Rs.5,50,000/-; advance Rs.5,00,000/- refund directed by trial court; O.S. No.66/2016 partly allowed; R.A. No.75/2019 dismissed 15.07.2022; registered sale deed within two months; relinquishment of claim on Item No.1; decree in terms of compromise; court fee refund Section 66 Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act 1958; Section 100 CPC second appeal; substantial question of law admitted but unstated.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of in terms of the compromise petition: specific performance decreed in respect of suit Item No.2, Sy.No.4/48 measuring 02 acres 20 guntas at Siddagondanahalli Village, Mathodu Hobli, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga District, with the respondent to execute a registered sale deed within two months from receipt of the certified copy; the appellant gave up all claim in respect of Item No.1, Sy.No.4/40 measuring 02 acres 20 guntas; Office directed to draw a decree in terms of the compromise petition and refund the Court fee to the appellant under Section 66 of the Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1958, on proper identification.