Dismissed¶53

Ningarajamma v. Annegowda

Karnataka HC2 Sept 2025RSA/1637/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru; RSA No. 1637 of 2017 (DEC); Justice E.S. Indiresh; decided 02.09.2025; second appeal under Section 100 CPC; against RA No.14/2011 (II Addl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Hassan, decree 10.04.2017) confirming OS No.22/2007 (Civil Judge & JMFC, Alur, decree 05.02.2011); dismissed for non-prosecution; appellants absent on three prior occasions; advocate Sri. Jayaprakash R. (absent for appellants).

What did the court decide?

With no representation for the appellants on three consecutive previous occasions, the appellants showed no interest in pursuing the appeal; accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶53

Ningarajamma Vs Annegowda — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:34387 RSA No. 1637 of 2017

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1637 OF 2017 (DEC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

NINGARAJAMMA

¶9

W/O LATE GOPALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

¶10

RUKMINI

¶11

D/O LATE GOPALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶12

SHANTHA D/O LATE GOPALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶13

SHIVAMMA

¶14

D/O LATE GOPALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

¶15

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

SHARADA

¶17

D/O LATE GOPALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶18

NINGARAJU S/O LATE GOPALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶19

ALL ARE R/AT THIPPANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶20

…APPELLANTS

¶21

(BY SRI. JAYAPRAKASH R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶22

¶23

NC: 2025:KHC:34387 RSA No. 1637 of 2017

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

AND:

¶26

ANNEGOWDA S/O LATE RANEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS

¶27

SHIVANNA S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

¶28

RAJEGOWDA S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

¶29

ALL ARE R/AT THIPPANAHALLI KUNDUR HOBLI ALUR TALUK - 524 315. HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶30

GOWRAMMA W/O LATE PUTTASWAMYGOWDA,

¶31

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT KENCHENAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-524315.

¶32

MUTHAMMA W/O LATE PUTTASWAMYGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

¶33

R/AT KANADAHALLI, PALYA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-524315.

¶34

SANNAMMA W/O BETTEGOWDA, D/O LATE DYAVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/AT MUDDANAHALLI,

¶35

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:34387 RSA No. 1637 of 2017

¶36

HC-KAR

¶37

KATTAYA HOBLI,

¶38

HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT-573201.

¶39

7. PUTTAMMA

¶40

W/O RAJANNA, D/O LATE DYAVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT MUTHIGEHIRALLI, SHANTHIGRAMA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573201.

¶41

LAKSHMAMMA W/O MATEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT BYRAPURA, KASABA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-524315.

¶42

DYAVAMMA W/O MALLEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS R/AT THIMMANAHALLI KUNDUR HOBLI ALUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT -524315.

¶43

SAVITHRAMMA W/O RANGEGOWDA S/O MALLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT THIPPANAHALLI, KUNDUR HOBLI, ALUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 524315.

¶44

(BY SRI. JAYAPRAKASH R., ADVOCATE)

¶45

…RESPONDENTS

¶46

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:34387 RSA No. 1637 of 2017

¶47

HC-KAR

¶48

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.04.2017 PASSED IN REGULAR APPEAL NO.14/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.02.2011 PASSED IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.22/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., ALUR.

¶49

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶50

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶51

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶52

There is no representation on behalf of the appellants.

¶53

Perusal of the order sheet would indicate that on the previous three occasions, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. This would shows that the appellants are not interested to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶54

Sd/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶55

Ningarajamma v. Annegowda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ningarajamma v. Annegowda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Kirit Morzaria Vs International Coach Builders

D.M. Gangamma Vs D.M. Hanumanthappa

H a Lokesh Gowda Vs Smt N R Arathi

J M Swamy Vs Government of India

Mr. Vijay Kumar B R Vs Krishna Creations

Mohammed Azeezulla Vs Ghouse Shariff