Dismissed¶¶43

Doddathayamma v. M H Lakshamana Reddy

Karnataka HC7 Jan 2025RSA/1566/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (NC: 2025:KHC:359); RSA No. 1566 of 2021 (PAR/POS-); oral judgment dated 07-01-2025 delivered by Hon'ble Mr Justice K.Natarajan. Appellant: Doddathayamma (Sri Rakshith R., Advocate). Respondents: M. H. Lakshamana Reddy (dead by LRs) and his nine legal representatives, Respondent Nos. 1-9 (Smt. N. V. Vachana, Advocate). Appeal under Section 100 CPC against the first appellate court's judgment dated 13.03.2020 in R.A.No.46/2014, which had set aside the trial court's decree dated 28.02.2014 in O.S.No.288/2012. Dismissed as withdrawn on a settlement memo recording an out-of-court settlement between the parties; no merits, holdings or quantum.

What the court decided

Doddathayamma Vs M H Lakshamana Reddy — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:359 RSA No. 1566 of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1566 OF 2021 (PAR/POS-)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

DODDATHAYAMMA

¶9

W/O SRINIVASA REDDY, D/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, A/O 50 YEARS, R/AT THINKAL VILLAGE, AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI. RAKSHITH R., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by VEDAVATHI A K Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

M. H. LAKSHAMANA REDDY S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, A/O 70 YEARS,

¶15

R/AT MALLIKARJUNA VILLAGE, AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.

¶16

DEAD BY LRS

¶17

SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:359 RSA No. 1566 of 2021

¶20

SMT. RUKMANIYAMMA W/O LATE VENKATESH REDDY, D/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT GANESH NAGAR, NNT ROAD, CHINTAMANI CITY.

¶21

SMT. SARASWATHAMMA W/O RAJANNA, D/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT THIMMASANDRA, WARD NO.31, CHINTAMANI CITY.

¶22

SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA W/O DEYARAREDDY D/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT DODDA SEEGEHALLI VILLAGE SIDHLAGHATA TALUK.

¶23

SRI. M. L. ANJANEYA REDDY S/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶24

SRI. M. L. ANANDA REDDY S/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶25

¶26

NC: 2025:KHC:359 RSA No. 1566 of 2021

¶27

SRI. M. L. HANUMANTHA REDDY S/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶28

M. L. SRINIVAS REDDY S/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶29

M L CHANDRA REDDY S/O LATE LAKSHMAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶30

RESPONDENT NO.1, RESPONDENT NO.5, AND RESPONDENT NO.9 ARE R/AT MALLIKARJUNAPURA VILLAGE AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK.

¶31

…RESPONDENTS

¶32

(BY SMT. N. V. VACHANA, ADVOCATE)

¶33

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.03.2020 PASSED IN RA.NO.46/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHINTAMANI. ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.288/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINTHAMANI.

¶34

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶35

¶36

NC: 2025:KHC:359 RSA No. 1566 of 2021

¶37

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN

¶38

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶39

Learned counsel for the appellant filed memo for withdrawal of the appellant, on the ground, matter has been settled between the parties outside the court.

¶40

The submission of learned counsel as well as learned counsel for the respondents is placed on record.

¶41

Smt. N.V.Vachana appears for the respondent and the

¶42

parties are also present.

¶43

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn .

¶44

Sd/(K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE

¶45

AKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 CT:SK