Dismissed¶40

Venkatappa v. Smt. Venkamma

Karnataka HC4 Sept 2025RSA/14/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru; Anant Ramanath Hegde, J.; RSA No. 14 of 2014 (INJ); Venkatappa & ors. v. Smt. Venkamma & ors.; dismissed for non-prosecution; no representation; appellants absent; counsel retired from brief (order dt. 28.08.2025); against judgment dt. 27.9.2013 in R.A.No.69/2009 setting aside decree dt. 1.9.2008 in O.S.No.12/2007, Kadur courts; S. 100 CPC; decided 04-09-2025.

What did the court decide?

As the appellants made no representation despite their names being mentioned in the cause list and appeared not interested in prosecuting the appeal of the year 2014, this Court dismissed the regular second appeal for non-prosecution. ¶40

Venkatappa Vs Smt. Venkamma — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:34873 RSA No. 14 of 2014

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2014 (INJ)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

VENKATAPPA

¶8

S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS.

¶9

NARAYANAPPA S/O VENKATAPPA

¶10

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.

¶11

DHAMODARA S/O VENKATAPPA

¶12

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.

¶13

JALANDHARA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.

¶14

VENKATESHA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.

¶15

ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS R/A HOCHIHALLI DASARAHATTI VILLAGE Digitally NAGARALU POST, SAKHARYANAPATNA signed by C HOBLI, KADUR TALUK - 577 548 HONNUR SAB CHIKKAMAGALUR DIST. Location: HIGH COURT OF (APPELLANTS - ABSENT) KARNATAKA

¶16

…APPELLANTS

¶17

AND:

¶18

SMT. VENKAMMA W/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.

¶19

RAMAPPA S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC:34873 RSA No. 14 of 2014

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THIMMAPPA S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.

¶24

MAHESHA S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.

¶25

RANGHANATH S/O LATE HALAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.

¶26

ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS AND RESIDENTS OF KARENAHALLI VILLAGE, MATHIGHATTA POST KASABA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK - 577 548 CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT.

¶27

T.V. VENKATAPPA @ YANKATAPPA S/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS AGRICULTURIST

¶28

R/AT JODI HOCHIHALLI DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, HOCHIHALLI DHAKALE NAGARALU POST, SAKHARAYAPATNA HOBLI KADUR TALUK - 577 548 CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT.

¶29

…RESPONDENTS

¶30

(BY SRI CHANDRASHEKAR RODNAVAR, ADV. FOR C/R-6; R-1 TO R-3 SERVED)

¶31

THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 27.9.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.69/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., KADUR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 1.9.2008 PASSED IN OS.NO.12/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., KADUR.

¶32

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶33

¶34

NC: 2025:KHC:34873 RSA No. 14 of 2014

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

¶37

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶38

This case is listed under the caption 'dismissal'

¶39

pursuant to the order dated 28.08.2025 wherein this Court permitted the counsel for the appellant to retire from brief. Thereafter, the Court directed the Registry to name all the appellants in the cause list.

¶40

Appellants' names are mentioned in the cause list. There is no representation. The appeal is of the year 2014. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution .

¶41

Sd/(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE

¶42

¶43

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Venkatappa v. Smt. Venkamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Venkatappa v. Smt. Venkamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Ando Paul Vs Gladys Pais

Krishnaiah @ Kushala Vs State of Karnataka

Sri B Virupakshi Vs Sri Suresh H

Sri Lingappa Vs Smt. Lakshmamma

M/S Gem Press Pvt. Ltd., Vs M/S Rajesh Ex Ports Ltd.

Eshwar T Vs State of Karnataka