Dismissed¶35

Nanjaiah v. Chandraiah

CPC – Section 100

Karnataka HC2 Sept 2025RSA/1319/2022

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), NC: 2025:KHC:34594; RSA No. 1319 of 2022; Nanjaiah vs Chandraiah and Rangamma; Hassan District, Channarayapatna Taluk, Hulleenahalli Village, Nuggenahalli Hobli; appeal dismissed as withdrawn on memo dated 02.09.2025; Section 100 CPC; arises out of O.S.No.123/2010 (decree 14.12.2017) and RA.No.10/2018 (judgment 18.09.2021); Justice V Srishananda; counsel Sri Rajendra V.G.; KAV List No. 1 Sl No. 25 CT-SG.

What did the court decide?

None; in view of the memo dated 02.09.2025 filed by counsel for the appellant seeking withdrawal, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. ¶35

Nanjaiah Vs Chandraiah — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:34594 RSA No. 1319 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1319 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

NANJAIAH S/O AMASAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HULLENAHALLI VILLAGE NUGGENAHALLI HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 116

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. RAJENDRA V.G., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

CHANDRAIAH S/O LATE RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

¶13

2. RANGAMMA

¶14

Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

W/O LATE RANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

¶16

BOTH ARE R/AT HULLENAHALLI VILLGE NUGGENAHALLI HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT PIN CODE - 573 116

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.09.2021 PASSED IN RA.NO.10/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:34594 RSA No. 1319 of 2022

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA. ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.12.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.123/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JDUGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA.

¶22

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

¶26

dated 02.09.2025 for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶27

"The undersigned counsel appearing for the appellant most respectfully submits as follows:

¶28

It is submitted that, the appellant has instructed over the phone to withdraw the appeal. Hence this memo is filed.

¶29

Wherefore, it is most respectfully pray that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶30