Dismissed¶29

Smt. Yashodamma v. Sri. G v Beeranna

Karnataka HC18 Nov 2025RSA/1277/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court; RSA 1277/2023; regular second appeal (partition classification) under Section 100 CPC dismissed for non-compliance of office objections / non-prosecution; appellants absent, counsel (Sri. Visweswaraiah, for appellants 1 and 2) did not appear nor produce notice acknowledgment; underlying dispute: R.A.No.64/2016 decree dated 08.01.2020 modifying O.S.No.244/2012 decree dated 27.08.2014 (Mulbagal, Kolar); no issues framed, no cases cited, no merits decided; limited precedential value.

What did the court decide?

The appeal had been listed for the seventh time for non-compliance of office objections. ¶25

Smt. Yashodamma Vs Sri. G v Beeranna — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:47335 RSA No. 1277 of 2023

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶7

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1277 OF 2023 (PAR)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. YASHODAMMA, W/O SRI. MUNISWAMY, D/O LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT H.GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, DUGGASANDRA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563131.

¶10

Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

SMT. V. PARVATHAMMA, W/O SRI. P.M.RAMU, D/O LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT NO.47, ‘A’ BLOCK, 1^ST CROSS, J.P. NAGAR, MYSURU-570003.

¶12

SMT. PADMAMMA, W/O LATE NARAYANAGOWDA, D/O LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT NO.174, 9^TH CROSS, 12^TH MAIN, KAMAKSHI HOSPITAL ROAD, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSURU-570008.

¶13

…APPELLANTS

¶14

(BY SRI. VISWESWARAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT NOS.1 AND 2 - ABSENT)

¶15

¶16

NC: 2025:KHC:47335 RSA No. 1277 of 2023

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

AND:

¶19

SRI. G.V. BEERANNA, S/O LATE VENKATARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT C/O DINNAHALLI SEENAPPPA, DOOR NO.6783, ’BYRESHWARA PRASANNA NILAYA’, THYAGARAJA COLONY, MULBAGAL TOWN, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563131.

¶20

…RESPONDENT

¶21

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.01.2020 PASSED IN R.A.NO.64/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.08.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.244/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR, ITINERATING AT MULBAGAL.

¶22

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

¶24

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶25

This matter is listed for the seventh time for noncompliance of the office objections. This matter is called twice both in the morning session and in the afternoon session and there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Inspite of this Court directed to produce the

¶26

NC: 2025:KHC:47335 RSA No. 1277 of 2023

¶27

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

acknowledgment for having notified the appellants, the learned counsel for the appellants has not produced the same. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance

¶30

of office objections.

¶31

Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

¶32

MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Smt. Yashodamma v. Sri. G v Beeranna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Yashodamma v. Sri. G v Beeranna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Lalitha Bai Vs Sri. Durgoji Rao @ Durgappa

Smt.M.Suganthy Vs Sri. J. Raju

Sri.R. Shankar Vs Sri.S. Hastimal Jain

Narasimha Murthy Vs Chikka Narasaiah

Smt G S Shanthamma Vs G P Narasimhareddy

B M Rudregowda Vs S C Latha