Dismissed¶¶37

Shaktinivas Builders Private Limited v. Shri.Ramchandra S/O Hanamant Kamu

Karnataka HC2 Jun 2025RSA/100048/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shaktinivas Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Ramchandra Kamu & Ors., RSA No.100048 of 2016 (SP), High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench (M.G.S. Kamal J., 02.06.2025): second appeal from OS 151/2008 and RA 3/2014, Belagavi (suit seeking declaration and mandatory injunction) — DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION, appellant absent despite sufficient service of notice; no merits adjudicated; no cases cited; usable only as an example of dismissal for non-prosecution under Order XLII Rule 1 r/w Section 100 CPC.

What did the court decide?

The regular second appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution: despite service of court notice (held sufficient), neither the appellant nor any representation on his behalf appeared; no adjudication was made on the merits of the appeal. ¶¶37

Shaktinivas Builders Private Limited Vs… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7256 RSA No. 100048 of 2016

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF JUNE 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶7

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100048 OF 2016 (SP)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SHAKTINIVAS BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT-394, SHUKRAWAR PETH, TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI – 590 006, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHRI RAMNATH SANTU ANAGOLKAR, AGE:71 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O:SHUKRAWAR PETH, TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI – 590 006.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(SERVICE OF COURT NOTICE TO APPELLANT IS HELD SUFFICIENT)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad

¶14

SHRI. RAMCHANDRA S/O. HANAMANT KAMU, AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER, R/O:PLOT NO.13 IN RS NO.10/3, VINAYAK NAGAR, VENGURLA ROAD, BELAGAVI – 591 108.

¶15

SHRI. LAXMAN S/O. HANAMANT KAMU, AGE:66 YEARS, OCC:CONTRACTOR, R/O:TANAJI GALLI, ANGOL, BELAGAVI – 590 006.

¶16

SMT. MALATI W/O. LATE NAGESH KAMU, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O:IIIRD CROSS, NEAR AMBIKA TILES, BHAGYA NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590 011.

¶17

SHRI. SAGAR S/O. LATE NAGESH KAMU, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC:SERVICE, R/O:IIIRD CROSS, NEAR AMBIKA TILES,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7256 RSA No. 100048 of 2016

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

BHAGYA NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590 011.

¶22

KUMARI VARSHA D/O. LATE NAGESH KAMU, AFTER MARRIAGE KNOWN AS VARSHA W/O. VIJAY MENSE, AGE:33 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O:IIIRD CROSS, NEAR AMBIKA TILES, BHAGYA NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590 011.

¶23

SHRI. YOGESH S/O. LATE NAGESH KAMU, AGE:30 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O:IIIRD CROSS, NEAR AMBIKA TILES, BHAGYA NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590 011.

¶24

SHRI. DIGAMBAR S/O. MAHADEV KAMU, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O:H.NO:383/1, MARUTI GALLI, ANGOL, BELAGAVI – 590 006.

¶25

SHRI. DATTA MAHADEV KAMU, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O:H.NO:383/1, MARUTI GALLI, ANGOL, BELAGAVI – 590 006.

¶26

SHRI. MANOHAR NARAYAN KAMU, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER, R/O:H.NO:26, "G" TYPE HAL COLONY, POST:HAL, BENGALURU – 560 017.

¶27

SHRI. ANANT NARAYAN KAMU, AGE:65 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O:VITH CROSS, BHAGYANAGAR, ANGOL, BELAGAVI – 590 006.

¶28

…RESPONDENTS

¶29

(BY SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R7 TO R10; V/O DATED: 29.08.2024 APPEAL STAND ABATED AGAINST R1 & R10; V/O DATED: 23.08.2024 APPEAL STAND ABATED AGAINST R9)

¶30

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLII RULE 1 R/W. SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.11.2015 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM BELAGAVI IN RA 3/2014 INSOFAR AS REFUSING THE RELIEF OF DECLARATION AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION IS CONCERNED; SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.11.2013 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC BELAGAVI IN OS 151/2008; ALLOW THE APPEAL WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT BY DECREEING THE SUIT IN OS 151/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC BELAGAVI AND ETC.,

¶31

¶32

NC: 2025:KHC-D:7256 RSA No. 100048 of 2016

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶35

ORAL ORDER

¶36

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL)

¶37

Court Notice issued to the appellant has been served through the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi on 21.10.2021 as seen in the communication dated 18.08.2021. Neither the Appellant is present nor there is any representation on his behalf. The appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶38

Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶39

VMB CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27

Shaktinivas Builders Private Limited v. Shri.Ramchandra S/O Hanamant Kamu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaktinivas Builders Private Limited v. Shri.Ramchandra S/O Hanamant Kamu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Bharathi K Vs M/S Canara Bank

Smt.Gowramma H.K. Vs the Authorised Officer

Sri.Vijaykumar Vs Sri.Rajanna

Ningappa S/O Basappa Barki Vs Yashavantappa S/O Melappa Tuvar

Durgappa S/O. Sunkavva Harijan @ Madar Vs the Secretary

Wahida Begum Vs Dilip