Dismissed¶35

Sri. Dongarasa S/O. Tukaramsa Bhandage v. Smt. Manjula W/O. Dongarasa Bhandage

Karnataka HC8 Oct 2025RPFC/100124/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench; Justice C M Joshi; decided 08.10.2025. RPFC No.100124 of 2025 under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 against orders dated 19.04.2025 and 16.07.2025 of the I Additional Family Judge, Hubballi in Criminal Misc.No.164/2025. Dismissed as withdrawn on the strength of counsel's memo for withdrawal after the petitioner withdrew the underlying trial-court case; pending interlocutory applications disposed of. Procedurally significant only; no ruling on the challenged orders.

What did the court decide?

Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to counsel's memo for withdrawal. ¶35

Sri. Dongarasa S/O. Tukaramsa Bhandage Vs Smt. Manjula W/O. Dongarasa Bhandage — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:13633 RPFC No. 100124 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI

¶7

REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.100124 OF 2025

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. DONGARASA S/O. TUKARAMSA BHANDAGE, S/O. TUKARAMSA BHANDAGE, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. RENUKA NAGAR, BHAIRIDEVARAKOPPA, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580025.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. KIRAN M. GOLI, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally
signed by
YASHAVANT
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR
NARAYANKAR Date:
2025.10.09
10:04:19
+0530

¶14

SMT. MANJULA W/O. DONGARASA BHANDAGE, W/O. DONGARASA BHANDAGE, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. GANESH COLONY, NEKAR NAGAR, OLD HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580028.

¶15

KUM. DEEPTHI D/O. DONGARASA BHANDAGE, D/O. DONGARASA BHANDAGE, AGE: 07 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. GANESH COLONY, NEKAR NAGAR, OLD HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580028.

¶16

KUM. NAKSHA D/O. DONGARASA BHANDAGE,

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC-D:13633 RPFC No. 100124 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

D/O. DONGARASA BHANDAGE, AGE: 04 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. GANESH COLONY, NEKAR NAGAR, OLD HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580028.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO A. CALL FOR RECORDS. B. ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE FINAL ORDERS PASSED ON INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 AND ORDER DATED 19.04.2025 PASSED BY HON’BLE I ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE, HUBBALLI IN CRIMINAL MISC.NO.164/2025, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. C. ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE RECALLED ORDERS PASSED ON INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5 AND ORDER DATED 16.07.2025 PASSED BY HON’BLE I ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE, HUBBALLI IN CRIMINAL MISC.NO.164/2025, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. D. COSTS OF THIS SUIT. E. TO AMEND THE PETITION IF NECESSARY IN THE INTEREST OF THE PETITIONER MAY KINDLY BE ALLOWED AND ETC.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

¶25

NC: 2025:KHC-D:13633 RPFC No. 100124 of 2025

¶26

HC-KAR

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI)

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the revision petition, which reads as under:

¶30

“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶31

HEREIN, the Advocate for the above mentioned Petitioner most humbly submits this Memo as under;

¶32

That in the above mentioned case, this Petition was filed challenging the impugned order passed by the Ist Additional Family Judge, Hubballi and now that the said case has been withdrawn by the Petitioner at trial court.

¶33

Hence I humbly pray before this Hon'ble Court that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit us to withdraw the case with a liberty to file fresh Petition in the interest of Justice and Equity.

¶34

Hence this Memo.”

¶35