Sri Yogananda H S v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC, Bengaluru; RP No. 704 of 2022; review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 CPC against order dated 21.07.2022 in W.P. No.4807/2021 (LB-BMP); petitioner claimed writ notice not served despite being arrayed as party; court found his interest sufficiently protected (action to clear alleged road encroachment ordered after notifying and hearing him); no error apparent on face of record; review petition and I.A.No.1/2022 dismissed; Judge R. Nataraj; 25.03.2025; parties: Yogananda H S v. BBMP and others.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 21.07.2022 in W.P. No.4807/2021 (LB-BMP) sufficiently protects the petitioner's interest, as it directs Respondent Nos.1 to 3 therein to take suitable action in accordance with law to clear the alleged encroachment of the road after notifying and hearing him. ¶32