Dismissed¶56

Khader Sharif v. Smt. Sharadamma

Karnataka HC31 Oct 2025RP/455/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pendente lite purchaser; review petition maintainability; Order 47 Rule 1 CPC; vendor not assailing judgment and decree; RSA No.658/2012 dated 12.06.2025; High Court of Karnataka; Anant Ramanath Hegde J.; review dismissed; Belur Taluk, Hassan district property litigation.

What did the court decide?

The Court found no reason to entertain the review petition filed by the pendente lite purchaser when his vendor has not assailed the judgment and decree passed by the Court, and accordingly dismissed the review petition. ¶55

Khader Sharif Vs Smt. Sharadamma — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:43817 RP No. 455 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31^ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REVIEW PETITION NO. 455 OF 2025

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

KHADER SHARIF S/O RAFIQ AHAMED, AGE ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT: MALLAPURA GRAMA, SANYASIHALI POST, KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN-573 115.

¶9

… PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. NANDISH PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

SMT. SHARADAMMA W/O LATE VIRUPAKSHEGOWDA

¶13

SINCE DEAD BY HER LR’S.,

¶14

1A. SMT. VASANTHA KUMARI W/O PUTTASWAMY GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT: KACHIHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BELUR-573 115.

¶15

Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶16

1B. SMT. HEMAVATHI W/O LATE BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT: KACHIHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115.

¶17

1C. SRI. NAGARAJA S/O LATE VIRUPAKSHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT: KACHIHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115.

¶18

1D. SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY S/O LATE VIRUPAKSHE GOWDA, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT: KACHIHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115.

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:43817 RP No. 455 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

1E. SRI. BALARAME GOWDA S/O LATE VIRUPAKSHEGOWDA, AGE ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶22

R/AT: KACHIHALLI VILLAGE,

¶23

KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115.

¶24

1F. SMT. SHYLAJA W/O SHANTHE GOWDA, AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT: KARIGADALU VILLAGE, BICCODU HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115.

¶25

1G. SMT. GAJATHRI W/O THIHIJAKSHA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT: THIMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, ALUR TALUK-573 213.

¶26

1H. SRI. DAYANANDA S/O LATE VIRUPAKSHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT: KACHIHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BELUR-573 115.

¶27

1I. SMT. JYOTHI W/O DHARMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT: HALTHORE VILLAGE, MADIHALLI HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115.

¶28

SRI. ABDUAL RASHEED S/O HUSSAIAH KHAN, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/AT: BANTENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115.

¶29

SRI. SEETHARAMU SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR.,

¶30

3A. SMT. SEETHAMMA W/O LATE SEETHARAMU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, GUNIKERE STREET, BELUR TOWN, BELUR-573 115. SINCE 3A. DECEASED R/BY HER LR’S., RESPONDENT NO.5A AND RESPONDENT NO.6, PRESENTLY BY 6A TO 6D.

¶31

SRI. B.N. DHARMARAJU S/O NANJE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶32

¶33

NC: 2025:KHC:43817 RP No. 455 of 2025

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

R/O. RAYAPURA VILLAGE,

¶36

KASABA HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115.

¶37

B.G. MANJAPPA S/O GUTEGOWDA, SINCE DIED BY HIS LR’S.,

¶38

5A. SRI. B.M. RANGANATH S/O LATE B.G. MANJAPPA, AGE ABOUT 51 YEARS, PWD CONTRACTOR, R/AT: SIDDESWARA STREET, FORT BELUR-573 115.

¶39

SRI. B.G. NARAGAJ S/O B.G. MANJAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR’S.,

¶40

6A. SMT. REVATHI W/O LATE SRI. B.G. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,

¶41

6B. KESHAVA PRASAD B.N. S/O LATE SRI. B.G. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

¶42

6C. SMT. SOWMYASHRI B.N. W/O DR. ARAVIND J.D. D/O LATE SRI. B.G. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

¶43

6D. SMT. B.N. LAVANYA W/O SOMASHEKAR H. D/O LATE SRI. B.G. NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

¶44

ARE RESIDING AT: NO.161, 4^TH MAIN, BCC LAYOUT WATER TANK, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 040.

¶45

… RESPONDENTS

¶46

THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO, JUDGMENT IN RSA NO.658/2012 DATED 12.06.2025 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU, MAY BE REVIEWED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶47

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶48

¶49

NC: 2025:KHC:43817 RP No. 455 of 2025

¶50

HC-KAR

¶51

CORAM:

¶52

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

¶53

ORAL ORDER

¶54

This review petition is filed by the pendente lite purchaser, who was not a party to the Suit, Regular Appeal or Regular Second Appeal.

¶55

This Court does not find any reason to entertain the review petition filed by the pendente lite purchaser when his vendor has not assailed the judgment and decree passed by

¶56

this Court and accordingly, review petition is dismissed .

¶57

Sd/(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE

¶58

brn CT:BCK LIST NO.: 19 SL NO.: 1

Khader Sharif v. Smt. Sharadamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khader Sharif v. Smt. Sharadamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Vijaya S. Malagi Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt. Kavita Andappa Ullagaddi Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Rajendra Vs Shrimath

Smt Gangabai Alias Umabai Vs Smt Bhagirathibai

Shri Vittal S/O Mayappa Hirekurbar Vs Shri Gopal S/O Jettappa Hirekurbaar

Sri Laxman S/O Beerappa Dabaj Vs the State of Karnataka