Dismissed¶36

Cv Projects Private Limited v. Sri. Nagraj Shetty. K

Karnataka HC5 Dec 2025RP/390/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Review Petition RP No. 390 of 2023; CV Projects Private Limited and others vs Nagraj Shetty K; review of order dated 09/11/2022 in MFA No. 3004/2022; Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 CPC; dismissed as infructuous; main suit disposed of during pendency; Ravi V Hosmani J; decided 05/12/2025; respondent served and unrepresented.

What did the court decide?

The Review Petition was dismissed as having become infructuous, the Court acting on learned counsel's submission that the main suit stood disposed of during the pendency of the Review Petition. ¶36

Cv Projects Private Limited Vs Sri. Nagraj Shetty. K — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:51512 RP No. 390 of 2023

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REVIEW PETITION NO. 390 OF 2023

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

CV PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 092 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRSENTATIVE P. ANIL KUMAR JAIN.

¶9

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶10

SRI. BHARATH SUBBA RAO S/O VENAKTARAMAIAH SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 092

¶11

SRI. SHASHIDHAR PAI S/O KOKKARNE SRINIVAS PAI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 092 (APPELLANTS 2 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR SPA HOLDER P. ANIL KUMAR)

¶12

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:51512 RP No. 390 of 2023

¶13

HC-KAR

¶14

SRI. VINOD S. MENON S/O SUNDHINDRA MENON AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 092.

¶15

MR. G NANDEESH S/O BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶16

NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 092.

¶17

MR. P. ANIL KUMAR JAIN NO. 106-10-11-12, AMURTHAHALLI BYATARAYANAPURA, BELLARY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 092.

¶18

…PETITIONERS

¶19

(BY SRI. VIVEK HOLLA, ADVOCATE)

¶20

AND:

¶21

SRI NAGRAJ SHETTY. K S/O S MAHABALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SRUSHUTI NIVAS, 2ND MAIN 6TH CROSS, ASHRAM COLONY SANJAY NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 094.

¶22

…RESPONDENT

¶23

(RESPONDENT IS SERVED AND UNEPRESENTED)

¶24

THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE

¶25

1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER

¶26

¶27

NC: 2025:KHC:51512 RP No. 390 of 2023

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

DATED 09/11/2022 IN MFA NO. 3004/2022 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS AS MAY BE JUST.

¶30

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS,

¶31

THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that during pendency of this Review Petition, main suit has been disposed of rendering this petition infructuous.

¶35

In view of said submission, Review Petition is

¶36

dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶37

Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

¶38

HNM

¶39

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31

Cv Projects Private Limited v. Sri. Nagraj Shetty. K

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Cv Projects Private Limited v. Sri. Nagraj Shetty. K

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Raghunandan G a Vs Sri Santhosh Kukmar S

Smt. B Rajeshwari Vs Smt. Jayalakshmi

Sri Theju Kumar Vs Mallesh M

Cv Projects Private Limited Vs Smt. N. Sudha Naik

K G Suresh Vs Smt Ramya M a

Smt. Pushpavathi, Vs Sri. Ravikumar. S.