Sri. R. Narasimhan v. Smt. Nusrath Naaz
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for non-prosecution of Regular First Appeal RFA No. 859 of 2022 (High Court of Karnataka, 18.09.2025; Anu Sivaraman and Rajesh Rai K JJ., per Rajesh Rai K). Challenged judgment and decree dated 28.03.2022 in OS No.770/2015, XII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, dismissing suit for declaration and injunction. Appellant Sri. R. Narasimhan (SPA holder S. Saravanan; advocate Sri. Manjunatha B V, absent); respondents Smt. Nusrath Naaz, Smt. Roohi Begum, Smt. Sumaiya Begum and Kum. Shabeena Begum (advocate Sri. Balaji N, absent). Filed under SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC; office objections uncomplied; peremptory order dated 05.09.2024 relied upon.
What did the court decide?
As there is no appearance for the appellant and office objections have not been complied with, in view of the peremptory order dated 05.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required.