Dismissed¶42

Parvathamma v. Ravindra @ Ravi

Karnataka HC14 Oct 2025RFA/822/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court (NC: 2025:KHC:40923), RFA No. 822 of 2010 (PAR/INJ), Smt. Parvathamma (since dead, by LRs) v. Ravindra @ Ravi and others — appeal against dismissal of suit for declaration and permanent injunction (O.S.No.1401/1987, decree dated 08.01.2010, 42nd Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore) dismissed for non-prosecution on 14.10.2025 for want of representation; no merits decided; useful only for procedural history.

What did the court decide?

There being no representation for the appellants, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶42

Parvathamma Vs Ravindra @ Ravi — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:40923 RFA No. 822 of 2010

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 822 OF 2010 (PAR/INJ)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. PARVATHAMMA SINCE DEAD BY LR'S [DIED ON 16.12.2020]

¶8

1(a) SRI. M. KANNIYAPPAN HUSBAND OF SMT. PARVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,

¶9

1(b) SRI. K. MANOHAR SON OF SMT. PARVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

¶10

1(c) SRI. K. SELVAM SON OF SMT. PARVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

¶11

Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

1(d) SRI. K. MOHAN, SON OF SMT. PARVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶13

1(e) SMT. K. MALA DAUGHTER OF SMT. PARVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

¶14

1(f) SRI. K. HARI, SON OF SMT. PARVATHAMMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

¶15

ALL THE APPELLANTS 1(a) TO 1(f) ARE AVAILABLE FOR SERVICE AT NO.87, 3^RD CROSS, 1^ST MAIN, KRISHNANANDA NAGAR,

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:40923 RFA No. 822 of 2010

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

NANDINI LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560096

¶19

…APPELLANTS

¶20

(BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT NOS.1(a) TO 1(f) AND SRI. VENKATESHA C., ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT - ABSENT)

¶21

AND:

¶22

RAVINDRA @ RAVI AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, SON OF LATE JAYARAMASWAMY

¶23

SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SON OF LATE JAYARAMASWAMY

¶24

SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SON OF LATE JAYARAMASWAMY

¶25

SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE JAYARAMASWAMY

¶26

SRI. NARAYANA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, SON OF LATE JAYARAMASWAMY

¶27

SMT. PREMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE JAYARAMASWAMY

¶28

SMT. USHA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE JAYARAMASWAMY

¶29

SMT. CHANDRAKALA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE JAYARAMASWAMY

¶30

ALL THE RESPONDENTS ARE RESIDING NO.27, 1^ST MAIN ROAD,

¶31

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:40923 RFA No. 822 of 2010

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

GORAGUNTEPALYA VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK

¶34

…RESPONDENTS

¶35

(BY SRI. S. SUDARSANA REDDY, SRI. K. VENKATA SUDHEER, SRI. B.N.JAGADEESH BABU, ADVOCATES FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 5;

¶36

SRI. R. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.5; VIDE ORDER DATED 14.08.2013, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NOS.1, 3, 4, 7 AND 8 IS HELD SUFFICIENT)

¶37

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W, O-41, R-1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.01.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1401/1987 ON THE FILE OF THE 42^ND ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.

¶38

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶39

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶40

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶41

There is no representation for the appellants. Hence, the

¶42

appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶43

Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE