Sri Sheena Poojary v. Smt Kamala Poojarthi
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (DB: Anu Sivaraman & Vijaykumar A. Patil JJ), 08-10-2025, RFA No.668/2022 (PAR) under S.96 CPC against partition decree dated 02.03.2022 in OS No.98/2017 (Senior Civil Judge & ACJM, Karkala): appeal disposed of in terms of compromise petition; 'A' Schedule property (Sy.No.206, 2 Acres 50 Cents) confirmed absolutely to appellant under registered Will dated 04-05-1991 of Late Chandu Poojary; 'B' Schedule properties (Land Tribunal occupancy rights, order dated 31-12-2011 in TRL No.17/76-77) taken by respondents 1–4 in equal 1/4th shares with Form No.10 mutation excluding appellant; own costs; mutual release; compromise decree; IAs dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Regular First Appeal disposed of in terms of the compromise petition: Respondents 1 to 4 acknowledged the 'A' Schedule property (Survey No.206, S.D.No.2P2-P1 measuring 2 Acres 50 Cents) as validly bequeathed to the Appellant under the registered Will dated 04-05-1991 of Late Chandu Poojary and relinquished all claims therein; the Appellant relinquished his rights in the 'B' Schedule properties in favour of Respondents 1 to 4, to be held in equal 1/4th shares with mutation through Form No.10 excluding the Appellant; each party to bear its own costs; mutual release of all claims relating to the suit properties; compromise decree to be drawn by the Registry; all interlocutory applications dismissed.