Dismissed¶25

Sri .G. Subramanya v. Sri . Nemichand S

Karnataka HC16 Apr 2025RFA/2540/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of regular first appeal; appeal dismissed as not pressed; Sec. 96 CPC; ejectment decree; O.S. No. 2709/2019; XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru; G. Subramanya v. Nemichand S.; memo for withdrawal; NC: 2025:KHC:16060; High Court of Karnataka; Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar; decision dated 16 April 2025.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as not pressed ¶25

Why is it important?

Sri .G. Subramanya Vs Sri . Nemichand S — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:16060 RFA No. 2540 of 2023

¶3

oIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2540 OF 2023 (EJE-)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI .G. SUBRAMANYA S/O T. GOVINDAPPA, AGED 65 YEARS, PROPRIETOR M/S VIKAS CORPORATION, NO.52, CHANDRASHEKAR ROAD, 3^RD STAGE, BEML GATE, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 039

¶8

ALSO RUNNING A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN AT SITE NO.8, KATHA NO.37/28, SITUATED AT PATTANAGERE VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 098. …APPELLANT

¶9

(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY K. P., ADVOCATE)

¶10

Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

AND:

¶12

SRI . NEMICHAND S., S/O SRI SHESHMAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO. 78/6, NAT STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU – 560 004.

¶13

…RESPONDENT

¶14

(BY SRI. C. SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE)

¶15

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2023 PASSED IN OS NO.2709/2019 ON THE

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:16060 RFA No. 2540 of 2023

¶18

FILE OF XVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT.

¶19

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶20

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶21

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.

¶22

The aforesaid memo is taken on record, which reads as under:

¶23

“Memo for withdrawal

¶24

The appellant herein respectfully submits before this Hon’ble Court, that the appellant herein is no more interested in prosecuting/conducting the case on merits and accordingly, prays leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the aforesaid appeal, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶25

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

¶26

Sd/(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

¶27

MDS

¶28

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5

Sri .G. Subramanya v. Sri . Nemichand S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Sri .G. Subramanya v. Sri . Nemichand S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri G H Prakash Vs Central Board of Secondary Education(Cbse Board)

Sharadayane Laxmi Ceramics LLP Vs Union of India

Smt Saraswati Biradar Vs Karnataka State Open University

M/S M B Industries Vs Union of India

M/S. Sri Ganesh Trading Co. Vs the Joint Commissioner of

M/S Sonovision Aetos Technical Vs Union of India