Dismissed¶30

Sri. Mahadeva v. Smt. Rukmini

Karnataka HC14 Oct 2025RFA/2084/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: withdrawal of appeal; dismissed as withdrawn; refund of court fees; court fee refund on proper identification; memo by counsel; Regular First Appeal; Karnataka High Court 2025; RFA No. 2084 of 2022 (SP); O.S.No.1250/2017; XXIX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore (CCH-30); Section 96 CPC; Order 41 Rule 1 CPC; Anu Sivaraman J.; Vijaykumar A. Patil J. Research value: minimal - disposed of on counsel's memo without adjudication of any merit issue; citable only as an instance of withdrawal with refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on the counsel's memo; Registry directed to refund the court fees paid on proper identification. ¶30

Sri. Mahadeva Vs Smt. Rukmini — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:40639-DB RFA No. 2084 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2084 OF 2022 (SP)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of karnataka

¶10

SRI. MAHADEVA S/O BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.97 YELACHENAHALLI KANAKAPURA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 078. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. V. RAVI PRAKASH, ADV.,) AND:

¶11

SMT. RUKMINI W/O VELAPURIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT 'SRI GANDA' POST OFFICE ROAD HEMAVATHI NAGAR HASSAN - 573 201.

¶12

…RESPONDENT

¶13

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN LEARNED THE HON'BLE XXIX ADDL. CITY

¶14

¶15

NC: 2025:KHC:40639-DB RFA No. 2084 of 2022

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-30) IN O.S.NO.1250/2017. AFTER PERUSAL BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-30) IN O.S.NO.1250/2017 DATED 25.10.2022 BY DECREEING THE SUIT AS PRAYED FOR IN THE SAID SUIT & ETC.

¶18

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶19

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶20

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶21

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

¶22

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

¶23

seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal.

¶24

The memo reads as under:

¶25

"The under signed counsel for the appellant humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above appeal, as withdrawn and the Registry may kindly be direct to refund the entire court fee paid by appellant, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶26