Dismissed¶35

Mr Haridas Upadhya v. Smt. Anusooya J Upadhya

Karnataka HC5 Dec 2025RFA/1884/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru (NC: 2025:KHC:51254); RFA No. 1884 of 2018 (PAR-) under Section 96 CPC against decree dated 28.07.2018 in O.S.No.16/2013, Senior Civil Judge, Kundapura (partition and separate possession); appellants Haridas Upadhya and K. Ganapathi Upadhya; withdrawal memo dated 01.12.2025; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Justice Hanchate Sanjeevkumar; decision date 05.12.2025; no merits decided, no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the appeal; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on the strength of the memo dated 01.12.2025 filed by learned counsel for the appellants seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. ¶35

Mr Haridas Upadhya Vs Smt. Anusooya J Upadhya — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:51254 RFA No. 1884 of 2018

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶6

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1884 OF 2018 (PAR-)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR. HARIDAS UPADHYA S/O LATE VADIRAJ UPADHYA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS R/O I.D.K 79/B, GAJAGIRI UPPER HUTTA COLONY BHADRAVATHI - 577 301.

¶9

MR. K. GANAPATHI UPADHYA S/O LATE VADIRAJ UPADHYA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O NO 3371/15B, 1ST FLOOR, BANASHANKARI NILAYA, KUVEMPU NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, MCC B BLOCK, DAVANAGERE - 560 004.

¶10

…APPELLANTS

¶11

Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

(BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M.S, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SMT. ANUSOOYA J. UPADHYA W/O LATE JANARDHAN UPADHYA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/O NEAR SOORYANARAYANA TEMPLE, KUMBHASHI VILLAGE AND POST, KUNDAPURA - 576 201.

¶15

SMT. YASHODHAMMA D/O LATE VADIRAJA UPADHYA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS C/O PRAKASH ACHARYA SRI POORNA PRAKASH

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:51254 RFA No. 1884 of 2018

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

SHEDIGULI HOUSE,

¶19

KATEEL, UDUPI - 574 146.

¶20

MR VISHWAMBAR BHAT S/O LATE KRISHNAVENI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O ANEGUDDE TEMPLE KUMBHASI VILLAGE AND POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK - 576 201.

¶21

MR. VYASA UPADHYA S/O LATE VADIRAJA UPADHYA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/O PRAMOD, NAVUDARAKERI GUNDMI VILLAGE AND POST, UDUPI TALUK - 576 101.

¶22

MR. RAJAGOPAL UPADHYA S/O LATE VADIRAJ UPADHYA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/O NO 32/3, CHOWDESHWARI NILAYA KIRTHI BAKERY ROAD NAGADEVERA HILL, BANGALORE - 06.

¶23

SMT. SAVITHRI W/O MR. I.K.S SHARMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/O NO. 67, SOUTH END ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560 004.

¶24

MR. ANANTH UPADHYA S/O LATE VADIRAJ UPADHYA KAUSTUB, 19/20, SHIVANNA LAYOUT, HALAGE VADERA HALLI, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 098.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI. VIGNESHWAR S. SHASTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R1, R3, R4, R6, R7 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶27

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:51254 RFA No. 1884 of 2018

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.07.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.16/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KUNDAPURA, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.

¶30

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶31

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶32

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶33

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo

¶34

dated 01.12.2025 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.

¶35

In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as