Dismissed¶37

Sri Mohammed Saifulla v. Sri T M Munirajaiah

Karnataka HC16 Sept 2025RFA/1405/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mohammed Saifulla v. T M Munirajaiah & others, RFA No. 1405 of 2021 (Karnataka HC, DB, 16.09.2025): appeal under S.96 CPC against dismissal (23.10.2020, OS No.8241/2004, XIII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bengaluru) of a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction; dismissed for non-prosecution as office objections stood uncomplied with, in view of the peremptory order dated 04.09.2024. No issues framed, no cases cited — of no precedential value; useful only as a disposal record.

What did the court decide?

Office objections in the appeal had not been complied with as at the date of hearing. ¶34

Sri Mohammed Saifulla Vs Sri T M Munirajaiah — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:37062-DB RFA No. 1405 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶9

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1405 OF 2021 (SP)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI MOHAMMED SAIFULLA S/O MOHAMMED YOUSUFF AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO. 773, BEHIND POSPS FOOD PRODUCTS NEAR BANGALORE ENGINEERING WORKS R.T. NAGAR POST BANGALOLRE - 560 032.

¶12

…APPELLANT

¶13

Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

(BY SRI. H R ANANTHA KRISHNA MURTHY.,ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

SRI T M MUNIRAJAIAH S/O CHIKKAMANAVARA MUNISWAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS

¶17

SRI ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS

¶18

SMT. PILLAMMA W/O LATE CHINNAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:37062-DB RFA No. 1405 of 2021

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

SRI SRINIVAA S/O LATE CHINNAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶22

RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 4 ARE R/AT THANISANDRA VILLAGE K.R. PURAM, HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.

¶23

SRI. K.M. ADUL BASHA AND IBRAHIM S/O MOHIDEEN SAAB AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.1, BAITH UI NOOR KEMPAIAH BLOCK OPPOSITE MUBARAK MASJID J.C. NAGAR BANGLAORE - 560 006.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.10.2020 PASSED IN OS No.8241/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.

¶26

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:37062-DB RFA No. 1405 of 2021

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶32