Dismissed¶38

Anand S/O Raghavendra Burli v. Indirabai W/O Raghavendra Burli

Karnataka HC16 Dec 2025RFA/100596/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution of Regular First Appeal No. 100596 of 2019 (PAR/POS) under Section 96 CPC, challenging the decree dated 27.09.2019 in O.S.No.13/2016 (partition and separate possession, Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Bagalkot). Grounds: no representation for appellants; appeal abated qua Respondent No.1 by order dated 10.01.2023; appellants lost interest. Decided 16.12.2025 by Division Bench of R. Devdas and B. Muralidhara Pai, JJ., High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. No cases cited, no amounts awarded.

What did the court decide?

There is no representation for the appellants, and the appeal is already abated insofar as Respondent No.1 is concerned, by order dated 10.01.2023. ¶36

Anand S/O Raghavendra Burli Vs Indirabai W/O Raghavendra Burli — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:18315-DB RFA No. 100596 of 2019

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100596 OF 2019 (PAR/POS)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

ANAND S/O. RAGHAVENDRA BURLI AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: RETD. BANK EMPLOYOEE, R/O: NO.263, 1^ST FLOOR, IDEAL HOME TOWNSHIP, 43^RD MAIN, 4^TH CROSS, RAJRAJESWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560098. NOW R/O: B-101, GAGAN VIHAR APARTMENT, IDEAL HOMES, RAJRAJESWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560098.

¶10

KRISHNA S/O. RAGHAVENDRA BURLI AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: 99/D3, ASHIRVAD, KEMPEGOUDA NAGAR, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BENGALURU-560119.

¶11

MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR

¶12

Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.12.17 15:58:33 +0530

¶13

(NOTICE TO A1 IS SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED; A2-DECEASED)

¶14

AND:

¶15

…APPELLANTS

¶16

INDIRABAI W/O. RAGHAVENDRA BURLI AGE: 83 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: 403, OM SRI RESIDENCY, 1^ST BLOCK, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, OPP: CORPORATION BANK, BANGALORE-560 061. NOW R/O: B-908, JAHANAVI ENCLAVE, 35/3, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, BTM 3^RD STAGE, KODICHIKKANNALLI, BENGALURU-560076.

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:18315-DB RFA No. 100596 of 2019

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

SUBHADRA W/O. ANNARAO KULKARNI AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: 403, OM SRI RESIDENCY, 1^ST BLOCK, UTTARAHALLI MAIN ROAD, OPP: CORPORATION BANK, BANGALORE-560061.

¶20

NOW R/O: B-908, JAHANAVI ENCLAVE, 35/3, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, BTM 3^RD STAGE, KODICHIKKANNALLI, BENGALURU-560076.

¶21

VINOD S/O. RAGHAVENDRA BURLI AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE TRADE, R/O: PANDURANG NIVAS, KILLA, BAGALKOT-587101.

¶22

ALKA @ LAXMI W/O. SHIRINAVAS UPADHAYA AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: SURYA RESIDENCY, 301 VALLABH NAGAR, 3^RD CROSS, UTTARAHALLI, CANARA BANK, BENGALURU-560061.

¶23

JAYALAXMI N. PATIL AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: "DEVARANJANI" HOUSE NO.34, GOKUL NAGAR, DODDAKALLASANDRA, 3^RD CROSS, BENGALURU-560061.

¶24

VIDYA W/O. NARAYANARAO AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: SATYANARAYANPETH, SATYANARAYAN NAGAR, GANGAVATHI-583227, DIST: EARLIER RAICHUR, NOW IN KOPPAL.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI. H.R.DESHPANDE AND

¶27

SMT. USHA DESHPANDE, ADVOCATES FOR C/R2; NOTICE TO R3 TO R6 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED; R1 IS ABATED VIDE ORDER DATED 10.01.2023)

¶28

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.09.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.13/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BAGALKOT, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND ETC.

¶29

3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:18315-DB RFA No. 100596 of 2019

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND

¶33

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS)

¶36

It is seen from the records that there is no representation for the appellants in this matter, and the appeal is already abated insofar as respondent No.1 is concerned by order dated 10.01.2023.

¶37