Disposed¶29

Sri. Vijaykumar S/O Virupakshappa v. Sri. Siddalingesh S/O Mallikarjunagouda Patil

Karnataka HC18 Jul 2025RFA/100226/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench, RFA No. 100226 of 2023 (SP), Vijaykumar v. Siddalingesh, decided 18-07-2025 by Justices R.Nataraj and Rajesh Rai K. Appeal under S.96 CPC 1908 against decree dated 06.02.2023 in O.S.No.92/2018 (Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Shiggaon) granting specific performance of contract. Disposed of on amicable settlement between parties reported in execution proceedings; full court fee ordered refunded. No issues adjudicated, no precedents cited, no quantum stated.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of as settled between the parties; office directed to refund the full court fee. ¶29

Sri. Vijaykumar S/O Virupakshappa Vs Sri. Siddalingesh S/O Mallikarjunagouda Patil — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8938-DB RFA No. 100226 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JULY 2025

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶10

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100226 OF 2023 (SP)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

SRI. VIJAYKUMAR, S/O. VIRUPAKSHAPPA HESARUR, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SHIGGAON, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI-581110.

¶13

…APPELLANT

¶14

(BY SRI. SUNIL S.DESAI, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

Digitally signed by CHANABASAPPA K KALLUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.07.22 11:22:58 +0530

¶17

SRI. SIDDALINGESH, S/O. MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SHYADAMBI, NOW AT HUBALI-580004.

¶18

…RESPONDENT

¶19

(BY SRI. S.G.KADADAKATTI, ADV. FOR CAVEATOR RESPONDENT)

¶20

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.02.2023 PASSED IN O.S.NO.92/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, SHIGGAON, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR RELIEF OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT.

¶21

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

¶23

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8938-DB RFA No. 100226 of 2023

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶26

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶27

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ)

¶28

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have settled the dispute amicably and such settlement is reported in the execution proceedings. He therefore, submits that this appeal may be disposed off as settled between the parties. He also prays that the office be directed to refund the entire court fee.

¶29

In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is disposed off.

¶30

Office is directed to refund the full court fee.

¶31

Sd/(R.NATARAJ) JUDGE

¶32

Sd/(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

¶33

KMS, Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31

Sri. Vijaykumar S/O Virupakshappa v. Sri. Siddalingesh S/O Mallikarjunagouda Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Vijaykumar S/O Virupakshappa v. Sri. Siddalingesh S/O Mallikarjunagouda Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramanna @ Ramappa S/O. Basappa Hallad Vs Ajaykumar S/O. Ramanna @ Ramappa Hallad

Gangadar S/O. Suresh Terdal Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Umesh Fakirappa Havakadad Vs the State of Karnataka

Ningappa S/O Basappa Barker Vs Smt. Kallavva W/O Sannayallappa Barker

Jitendra Ranappa Holer @ Rajagoli Vs Parasharam Laxman Holer @ Rajagoli

Shravanakumar S/O. Nattamalljli Jain Vs the State of Karnataka