Dismissed¶3
M.R.Manjunath Akalwadi v. Sri. M. R. Satyanarayan
Karnataka HCRFA/100054/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Abatement - appeal deemed abated against ALL respondents on failure to substitute LRs of deceased respondent (relying on Suresh Chandra v. Parasram, 2025 INSC 873); Karnataka HC Dharwad RFA 100054 of 2022 dismissed as abated; Section 96 CPC; challenge to decree dated 27.11.2020 in O.S.No.191/2012, Dharwad (declaration, mesne profits, partition, possession, injunction); oral order 27.11.2025 per R. Devdas, J.; no representation for appellant.
What did the court decide?
Even though the appeal had been dismissed as abated against respondent No.10, no steps had been taken by the appellant to get the matter restored in respect of that respondent. ¶49