Disposed

Rudrashetty Patil Since Deceased by Lrs and Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition Officer and Anr.

Karnataka HC9 Jun 2025MSA/200014/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Leave Appeal disposed by recording a settled mediation agreement between land acquisition claimants and the State regarding compensation amount and interest claims for land acquired for irrigation project.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed based on recorded mediation agreement fixing compensation and terms for payment.

Rudrashetty Patil Since Deceased by Lrs and Ors. Vs… — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JUNE 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL

¶8

MISCL SECOND APPEAL NO.200014 OF 2016

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

RUDRASHETTY PATIL,

¶11

SINCE DECEASED BY LRS.

¶12

KARISIDDAPPA S/O. LATE RUDRASHETTY PATIL, AGE: 71 YEARS.

¶13

TEJIRAO S/O. LATE RUDRASHETTY PATIL, AGE: 65 YEARS.

¶14

KARABASAPPA S/O. LATE RUDRASHETTY PATIL, AGE: 61 YEARS.

¶15

Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad

¶16

SHIVASHANKAR S/O.LATE RUDRASHETTY PATIL, AGE: 57 YEARS.

¶17

RES. NOS.1 TO 4 ARE OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HARSOOR VILLAGE, TQ AND DIST: KALABURAGI – 585 101.

¶18

BASAWARAJ S/O. LATE RUDRASHETTY PATIL, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR’S.

¶19

5A. INDU PATIL @ INDUMATI W/O. LATE BASAWARAJ, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD.

¶20

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

5B. VISHAL S/O. LATE BASAWARAJ, AGE: 17 YEARS, MINOR U/G OF 5(A) SMT. INDI PATIL @ INDUMATI NATURAL MOTHER, OCC: STUDENT. BOTH ARE R/O: H.NO.E/7/2978/B.E/7/2935 TO E/7/3075, BANK COLONY, KHB COLONY, KALABURAGI.

¶23

GURUPADAPPA S/O. RUDRASHETTY PATIL, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HARSOOR VILLAGE, TQ: DIST: KALABURAGI – 585 101.

¶24

…APPELLANTS

¶25

(BY SRI. S.S. SAJJANSHETTY AND SMT. SHIVALEELA S.S., ADVOCATES)

¶26

AND:

¶27

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, M & MIP KALABURAGI, ROOM NO. 7, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, KALABURAGI, PIN NO. 585 101.

¶28

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, KALABURAGI – 585 101.

¶29

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KNNL, BENNITHORA PROJECT, HEBBAL DIVISION, TQ: CHITTAPUR, DIST: KALABURAGI.

¶30

…RESPONDENTS

¶31

(BY SRI. K. SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY AG A/W SRI. K. MALLAHA RAO, AAG AND SMT. T. MAYA RAJANN, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2; SRI SANJEEVKUMAR C. PATIL AND SRI. SUDARSHAN M., ADVOCATE FOR R3; V/O DATED 01.10.2024 NOTICE TO PARITES DISPENSED WITH)

¶32

¶33

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.10.2014 PASSED BY III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT KALABURAGI IN LAC-APPEAL NO.399/2013 VIDE ANNEXURE – A AND PLEASED TO MODIFY BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AT RS. 1,24,293-PER ACRE DRY LAND FROM RS.67,000-PER ACRE AS AWARDED BY THE 1^ST APPELLATE COURT, WITH ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS, INTEREST AND WITH COST AND ETC.,

¶36

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶37

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶38

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL)

¶39

This appeal is filed by the appellants/claimants claiming to be the owners of land bearing Sy.No.152, measuring 12 acres and 28 guntas situated in Harsoor Village, Gulbarga District which was acquired for the purpose of construction of Bennethora Project in terms of Preliminary Notification dated 06.08.1992 issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

¶40

The Special Land Acquisition Officer had determined the compensation at Rs.9,000/- per acre which was enhanced by the Reference Court vide order dated 23.01.1998 in LAC No.625/1997 to Rs.32,200/- per acre. In the appeal filed in LACA No.399/2013 before the III Additional District Judge, Kalaburgi, the said compensation was further enhanced to

¶41

¶42

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶43

HC-KAR

¶44

Rs.67,000/- per acre vide judgment and award dated 15.10.2014. Aggrieved by the same, the appellants/claimants have preferred the present appeal seeking further enhancement.

¶45

The Coordinate Bench of this Court taking note of the earlier order passed by this Court in MSA No.200014/2018 had allowed the aforesaid appeal by order dated 13.04.2018 granting enhanced compensation of Rs.1,76,388/- per acre of dry land with all statutory benefits. However, it was clarified that the appellant/claimant are not entitled for interest for the delayed period.

¶46

Aggrieved by the same, respondent-KNNL had carried the matter in appeal to the Apex Court. By orders dated 10.05.2022 and 12.03.2024 passed in the said civil appeal along with connected matters, the Apex Court set aside the earlier order passed by this Court and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. Accordingly, matter was taken up for hearing.

¶47

After hearing the matter on merits and upon the submissions made by the learned Advocate General and the

¶48

¶49

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶50

HC-KAR

¶51

learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the respondents, the matter was placed before the Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.V. Chandrashekar, Former Judge, High Court of Karnataka for mediation. Accordingly, mediation process was undertaken and the parties have arrived at amicable resolution of their dispute by entering into a Mediation Agreement. The process of settlement has been accepted and approved by the respondent- State Government as seen in the Communication bearing No.d¸ÀAE 124 JAJAf 2024, dated

¶52

23.04.2025 produced by learned Additional Advocate General.

¶53

The terms of the Mediation Agreement are as under:

¶54

MEDIATION AGREEMENT

¶55

"Thorough discussions were held in the presence of the Learned Mediator, Justice A.V.Chandrashekhar (Retired), the Managing Director of Karnataka Neeravari Nigam (Hereinafter "KNNL"), the Learned Advocate General, the Additional Advocate General, Kalaburagi, the Learned Advocates appearing for the parties, and the authorized representatives of KNNL.

¶56

The present appeal is one of several land acquisition matters pertaining to various irrigation projects which are being undertaken and managed by KNNL, which were remanded to the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench at the instance of the KNNL which preferred Special Leave Petitions before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by the orders dated 10.05.2022 and 12.03.2024. By order dated 27.09.2024, the

¶57

¶58

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶59

HC-KAR

¶60

Hon'ble High Court referred the matters for mediation. The present compromise has been duly approved by the State Government of Karnataka on 23.04.2025. After considering the various factors like the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and deliberations between the parties, the parties have voluntarily agreed as follows:

¶61

(a) The market value of the land acquired is calculated and arrived at Rs.1,62,703/- (Words: One Lakh Sixty Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Three only);

¶62

(b) The Appellant/s(Claimant/s) is/are entitled for all statutory benefits under Land Acquisition Act, except for the period of delay in filing the Appeal before the First Appellate Court and for the period of delay in filing the Appeal before the Hon'ble High Court;

¶63

(c) No interest is payable to the Appellant/s(Claimant/s) for the period of delay in filing the Appeal before the First Appellate Court and for the period of delay in filing the Appeal before the Hon'ble High Court;

¶64

(d) The Appellant/s (Claimant/s) agree that they will give up statutory interest for a period of two years;

¶65

(e) It is agreed to between the parties that the calculation of interest is made up to the date of approval by the State Government of Karnataka i.e. 23.04.2025.

¶66

(f) Subject to the vacation of stay in W.P. (C) No. 100913 of 2025, it is agreed to between the parties that, in case the agreed amount is not paid within four months from the signing of this agreement, KNNL will not be entitled for exemption of payment of interest for a period of two years as outlined in clause (d);

¶67

(g) The Appellant/s(Claimant/s) has/ have understood and agreed that the payment of amounts quantified in the present agreement would be made

¶68

7 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶69

HC-KAR

¶70

from the through the P.D. account of KNNL of the Chief Accounts Officer, KNNL, Dharwad. (Head of Account "8443-00-106") as outlined in G.O. No. AE 13 TAR 2023 dated 27.09.2024;

¶71

(h) The Appellant/s(Claimant/s) agree that the present agreement would be a full and final settlement of their claims and they would not be entitled to any differential interest except in accordance with the terms of this agreement;

¶72

(i) Appellant/s(Claimant/s) has/have agreed to give an undertaking in writing about the genuineness of their claim and undertake to furnish copy of the Passbook and Aadhar Card immediately upon signing of the agreement;

¶73

(j) The Appellant/s(Claimant/s) agree that the present agreement would be a full and final settlement of their claims and they and/or their legal heirs undertake to not agitate any further claims in this regard, in the future;

¶74

(k)The Appellant/s(Claimant/s) agree to withdraw all pending Execution Petition(s) in terms of this agreement;

¶75

(l) KNNL would not be bound to pay any further compensation or claim to a third party, should any dispute arise between the Appellant/s(Claimant/s) and such person, in respect of ownership and claim of the acquired land;

¶76

(m) KNNL has agreed to pay the costs to the Appellant/s(Claimant/s) which is equivalent to the Court fee paid by the Appellants. Consequently, KNNL is entitled for return of Court fee from this Hon'ble Court, as per law;

¶77

(n) KNNL has undertaken that the payment of agreed amount will be deposited directly to the account of the Appellant/s(Claimant/s) through the P.D. account of KNNL of the Chief Accounts Officer,

¶78

8 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶79

HC-KAR

¶80

KNNL, Dharwad. (Head of Account "8443-00-106") as outlined in G.O. No. AE 13 TAR 2023 dated 27.09.2024;

¶81

(o) The present settlement shall not be considered either as a precedent or a policy decision or a proposal binding on KNNL for cases, other than the present matter referred to Mediation.

¶82

The parties to this agreement have entered into this compromise voluntarily, on their own volition, without any coercion or misrepresentation and the contents of this agreement have been explained to and understood by the Appellant/s(Claimant/s) in vernacular as well."

¶83

The terms of the Mediation Agreement have been accepted by the parties. The Mediation Agreement not being opposed to any provisions of law, same is taken on record. Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid Mediation Agreement.

¶84

Sri. Mallaha Rao K, learned Additional Advocate

¶85

General for the respondent-State and learned counsel for respondent-KNNL submit that since the "Personal Deposit Account" which is opened in the name of the Chief Accounts Officer-KNNL, Dharwad, for the purpose of disbursing the compensation amount is subject matter of writ petition in W.P.(C) No.100913/2025, necessary steps will be taken to either vacate or modify the aforesaid interim order to the

¶86

¶87

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶88

HC-KAR

¶89

extent of subject matter of this appeal and that if in the event of any further impediment in implementing the terms of the Mediation Agreement, appropriate alternate arrangements will

¶90

be made to comply with the terms of the Mediation Agreement. Submission is taken record as an undertaking to this Court.

¶91

It is made clear that in the event of any failure on the part of respondent-KNNL, the appellants/claimants would be at liberty to seek enforcement and execution of this order in accordance with law. In such an event, appellants/claimants would also be entitled for all the statutory benefits including interest till realization.

¶92

This Court places on record its appreciation of the earnest efforts made by Hon'ble Justice A.V.Chandrashekar, former Judge, High Court of Karnataka, Sri. K. Shashi Kiran Shetty, learned Advocate General, Sri. K.Mallaha Rao, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent-State, Smt.T.Maya, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1, Ms.L.Mohini Bhat and Ms.Hetu Arora Sethi, Sri. Sanjeev Kumar Patil, Sri. M.Sudarshan, Sri.Abhimanyu, learned counsel for respondent-KNNL, Sri.Harshavardhan R.

¶93

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3123 MSA No. 200014 of 2016

¶94

10 -

¶95

HC-KAR

¶96

Malipatil, Sri. Nagaraj Patil, Sri. Shivashankar H. Manur, learned counsel for the appellants, as well as Sri. Rajesh, Managing Director of KNNL, Sri. Girish, Secretary of KNNL in amicably resolving the dispute.

¶97

Sd/(M.G.S.KAMAL) JUDGE

¶98

SH/CT-ASC List No.: 19 Sl No.: 25

Rudrashetty Patil Since Deceased by Lrs and Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition Officer and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rudrashetty Patil Since Deceased by Lrs and Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition Officer and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karnataka Bank Limited Vs Kobanna

Tippanna Since Dead by Lrs Vs the Special Land Acquisition

Hanamanthraya by Lrs Vs the Spl Land

Amruthraya by Lrs and Ors. Vs the Spl

Sayappa Vs the Spl Land

Basawanthraya by Lrs and Ors. Vs the Spl Land Acquisition Officer