Dismissed¶26

V Narayanamma v. Kundavaram Bhagyavathi

Karnataka HC14 Aug 2025MFA/88/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MFA 88/2023 (MV-D), Karnataka HC, dismissed for non-prosecution on 14.08.2025 (Lalitha Kanneganti J.). Enhancement-of-compensation appeal under S.173(1) MV Act against award dated 24.07.2018 in MVC No.133/2014, Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Pavagada. Appellant V Narayanamma (counsel Shantharaj K., absent); respondents Kundavaram Bhagyavathi and Legal Cell Tata AIG Ins.Co.Ltd. Repeated non-representation (25.11.2024, 13.06.2025, 01.08.2025, 07.08.2025) and non-compliance with office objections; no merits decided, no cases cited, no amounts stated.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, as there was repeatedly no representation on behalf of the appellant, office objections were not complied with, and the appellant appeared not interested to pursue the matter. ¶26

V Narayanamma Vs Kundavaram Bhagyavathi — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:31524 MFA No. 88 of 2023

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2023 (MV-D)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

V NARAYANAMMA W/O LATE M MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR WATER TANK ROAD, PAVAGADA TOWN-561202.

¶9

APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. SHANTHARAJ K.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) V/O DATED 02.11.2023, NOTICE TO R1 IS D/E O MAHESH FOR R2

¶11

AND:

¶12

KUNDAVARAM BHAGYAVATHI W/O T.B.S. SAMPATHKUMAR, AGED MAJOR, R/O NO.7-1368-1-10, ELUKU ESTATE, NEAR VARTHA OFFICE, KURNOOL -518467

¶13

Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

LEGAL CELL TATA AIG INS.CO.LTD. C/O D.NO.4/501, 5TH FLOOR, BUILDING NO.4, INFINITY PART, DINDOSHI, MAJOD (E) MUMBAI-400097.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED.24.07.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.133/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, PAVAGADA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:31524 MFA No. 88 of 2023

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶22

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶23

There was no representation on behalf of the appellant on 25.11.2024 and two weeks time was granted for complying with the office objections. Again on 13.06.2025 office objections were not complied and there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again the matter came up on 01.08.2025, there was no representation and the matter was ordered to be listed for disposal on 07.08.2025. Again on 07.08.2025 the matter was directed to be listed today.

¶24

Today also there is no representation. It appears that the

¶25

appellant is not interested to pursue the matter.

¶26

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non

¶27

prosecution .

¶28

SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

¶29