Saleem v. Haseena
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, MFA No. 8032 of 2012 (MV-I), decided 07.03.2025 by Hon'ble Smt. Justice Lalitha Kanneganti (NC: 2025:KHC:9786). Statute: Section 173(1), Motor Vehicles Act. Parties: Saleem (appellant/claimant; Sri. Abdul Khadar for Sri. Mushtaq Ahmed); Haseena (Respondent No. 1, auto-rickshaw owner, served and unrepresented); Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co. Ltd. (Respondent No. 2, Sri. P.S. Raju). Impugned decision: dismissal dated 08.12.2011 of compensation claim MVC.No.325/2009, MACT-10, Tumkur. Result: appeal dismissed for non-prosecution for repeated non-appearance of the appellant's counsel. Search value limited to default-dismissal practice; contains no holdings on liability, negligence or quantum and engages no precedent.
What did the court decide?
The Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.