Dismissed¶25

Sri Harshith v. Sri Sujith Kumar Alva

Karnataka HC15 Oct 2025MFA/5685/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

NC: 2025:KHC:41578; HC-KAR; MFA No. 5685 of 2018 (MV-D); High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; Dr. Justice K.Manmadha Rao; oral judgment dated 15-10-2025; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; MVC No.1515/2015, MACT Puttur; claimant Sri Harshith (minor, rep. by Ramanna Gowda B) v. Sri Sujith Kumar Alva and Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd, Puttur; filed under S.173(1) MV Act; enhancement of compensation sought but appeal not prosecuted. Keywords: dismissal for non-prosecution, MFA (MV-D), MACT Puttur, Oriental Insurance Co Ltd, enhancement of compensation.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri Harshith Vs Sri Sujith Kumar Alva — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:41578 MFA No. 5685 of 2018

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5685 OF 2018 (MV-D)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI HARSHITH AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, S/O LATE GUDDAPPA GOWDA & LATE SMT RUKMINI, MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MATERNAL UNCLE, & DIRECT BROTHER OF LATE SMT RUKMINI, SRI RAMANNA GOWDA B AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O GUDDAPPA GOWDA, R/O BALAKABE HOUSE, YEDAMANGALA POST & VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK & D K DISTRICT- 574 201. …APPELLANT

¶9

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶10

(BY SRI. HARSHITH, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

SRI SUJITH KUMAR ALVA S/O A KRISHNA ALVA, MAJOR, R/AT YETHMOGALU GUTTHU HOUSE, KANDAVARA VILLAGE AND POST, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 014.

¶13

THE BRANCH MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD BRANCH OFFICE - KRISHNA PRASAD BUILDING,

¶14

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:41578 MFA No. 5685 of 2018

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

MAINROAD, PUTTUR TALUK, D K DISTRICT- 574 201.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02/11/2017, PASSED IN MVC NO.1515/2015, ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AND MEMBER, MACT, PUTTUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶19

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

¶21

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶22

It appears that the learned counsel for the appellant

¶23

has been designated as the Judge of the High Court of Karnataka and this Court had sent the Court notice to the appellant. On receipt of the notice, the appellant did not

¶24

turn up to represent the matter.

¶25

In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed

¶26

for non-prosecution .

¶27

Sd/(DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE

¶28

GSR,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Sri Harshith v. Sri Sujith Kumar Alva

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sri Harshith v. Sri Sujith Kumar Alva

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundara Gowda Vs K v Ganapayya

Nagarajagowda Vs Sharadamma

Sri. G D Manjunath Vs Sri. G D Ramesh

Sri. C. Jayachandra Vs Sri. Narasappa

Sri Vishwanatha P Vs Sri Sujith Kumar Alva

Sri Shanthalingaswamy Vs Smt. Shivamma