Dismissed¶29

Ilyas Khan v. the Competent Authority

Karnataka HC17 Feb 2025MFA/5006/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of appeal; memo dated 17.02.2025; MFA dismissed as withdrawn; Section 16 KPIDFA Act 2004; Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act; Ambidant Marketing Pvt Ltd; Competent Authority; Ashok D.R. Joint Secretary; Syed Fareed Ahmed Managing Director; Misc.No.1601/2022; XCI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-92) Bangalore; impugned order dated 07.09.2023; Ilyas Khan appellant; K.R. Krishnamurthy; Veeresh R. Budihal; Anu Sivaraman; Vijaykumar A. Patil; Karnataka High Court 2025; NC: 2025:KHC:6942-DB.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the appeal granted pursuant to memo dated 17.02.2025; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. ¶29

Ilyas Khan Vs the Competent Authority — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6942-DB M.F.A. No.5006/2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT

¶3

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5006/2024 (KPIDFA)

¶5

BETWEEN:

¶6

ILYAS KHAN SON OF LATE MUSTAFA KHAN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS KUVEMPU NAGAR, BESIDE MODERN SCHOOL KEELUKOTE LAYOUT, KOLAR 563101.

¶7

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶8

(BY SRI. K.R. KRISHNAMURTHY, ADV.,)

¶9

AND:

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR M/S AMBIDANT MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR MINI V.V TOWER, PODIUM BLOCK DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560 001 REP. BY ITS COMPETENT AUTHORITY DR. ASHOK D.R. JOINT SECRETARY.

¶12

M/S. AMBIDANT MARKETING PVT LTD REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.9A K.H.B MAIN ROAD, KANAKANAGARA R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-50 032 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. SYED FAREED AHMED

¶13

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6942-DB M.F.A. No.5006/2024

¶14

SON OF D.S. JALALUDDIN AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS PRESENTLY IN KANPUR CITY DISTRICT JAIL THE JAIL SUPERINTENDENT, KANPUR CITY DISTRICT JAIL, KANPUR CITY UTTAR PRADESH- 208001.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. VEERESH R. BUDIHAL, ADV., FOR R1 R2 SERVICE OF NOTICE IS D/W V.C.O.DTD:27.01.2025)

¶17

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 16 OF THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 2004, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07.09.2023 PASSED BY LEARNED XCI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-92), BANGALORE IN MISC.NO.1601/2022 (AT ANNEXURE-A) & ETC.

¶18

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶19

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶21

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶22

( PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL )

¶23

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

¶24

dated 17.02.2025 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal.

¶25

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6942-DB M.F.A. No.5006/2024

¶26

2. The memo reads as under:

¶27

"The undersigned advocate appearing on behalf of the Appellant in the above matter hereby request this Hon'ble Court to permit the Appellant to withdraw the instant appeal. Further, request this Hon'ble Court to take the instant memo on record and pass suitable orders in the interests of justice and equity."

¶28

3. In view of the said memo, the appeal is

¶29

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶30

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶31

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

¶32

ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15

Ilyas Khan v. the Competent Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ilyas Khan v. the Competent Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shree Vaishnavi Vs the State of Karnataka

Power Grid Corporation of India Limited Vs M/S Abhishek Developers

Rajiv Gandhi University of Vs Ms. Nusra Anjum S.A.

Executive Engineer Vs Shivanna

M/S. Ktk Group Vs the Competent Authority and

Sri. Satish Pai Vs Smt Akkayamma