Sri. M. Krishna Reddy v. Ace Forge Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim injunction applications under O.39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC rejected; appeals under O.43 Rule 1(r) CPC disposed of consensually without deciding merits; trial court requested to complete O.S.Nos.9950/2015 and 9952/2015 (defendants' evidence stage) within six months of certified-copy production; parties ordered to co-operate without unnecessary adjournments. Keywords: Ace Forge Private Limited; Arun Ballakur; Madhavi Ballakur; M. Krishna Reddy; K. Nagarathna; K. Parvathamma; K. Padma; LXV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge Bengaluru (CCH-66); expeditious disposal direction; time-bound trial; HC-KAR; NC 2025:KHC:25468. Useful when citing a Karnataka High Court instance of injunction-rejection appeals being disposed of with six-month trial-completion directions rather than on merits.
What did the court decide?
All three appeals disposed of on the joint submission of both sides: the trial Court is requested to dispose of O.S.No.9950/2015 and O.S.No.9952/2015 within an outer limit of six months from the date of production of the certified copy of the order; both parties directed to co-operate with the trial Court without seeking unnecessary adjournments; no orders as to costs.