Disposed¶49

Sri Bhadra Reddy v. M/S Sri Vinayaka Infra

Karnataka HC1 Sept 2025MFA/3990/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Consent/settlement disposal of arbitration appeal: Karnataka HC Bengaluru, MFA No. 3990 of 2024 (AA), under S.37(1)(c) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 against dismissal of S.34 petition in A.P.No.201/2022 (Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District). Appellants: Bhadra Reddy, Rajesh Kothari & Son and other family members; Respondents: M/s Sri Vinayaka Infra and Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri (Retd.). Joint memo of amicable settlement accepted; appeal disposed on 01.09.2025; decree to be drawn accordingly. Bench: Anu Sivaraman and Rajesh Rai K, JJ. Keywords: Section 34, Section 37(1)(c), joint memo, amicable settlement, compromise disposal, arbitration appeal.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of in terms of the joint memo recording amicable settlement between the parties; decree to be drawn up accordingly.

Sri Bhadra Reddy Vs M/S Sri Vinayaka Infra — Arbitration | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:34202-DB MFA No. 3990 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶10

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3990 OF 2024 (AA)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

SRI BHADRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O.SRI. RAMA REDDY, RESIDING AT CHANDAPURA VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 081.

¶13

Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SRI. RAJESH KOTHARI & SON REPRESENTED BY ITS KARTHA SRI. RAJESH B. KOTHARI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O.SRI.G.M.B. KOTHARI, NO.15, 1^ST CROSS, CSI COMPOUND, LALBAGH ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU-560 027.

¶15

SMT. SANTHOSH R.KOTHARI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, W/O.SRI. RAJESH B. KOTHARI, R/AT NO.15, 1^ST CROSS, CSI COMPOUND, LALBAGH ROAD CROSS, BENGALURU-560 027.

¶16

SMT. AARTI S.KOTHARI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:34202-DB MFA No. 3990 of 2024

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

W/O.SRI. SANJAY M. KOTHARI, RESIDING AT NO.35/B, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, YADAVAGIRI, MYSURU-570 020.

¶20

SRI.T.SUNIL KOTHARI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O.SRI.M.TEJRAJ KOTHARI, RESIDING AT NO. 114, DAYA MARGA, SIDDARTHANAGAR, MYSURU-570011.

¶21

SRI. H. N. PRAKASHCHAND AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. S/O.LATE NORATHMAL,

¶22

SMT. R. PRIYA JAIN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. W/O SRI P RAKESH KUMAR

¶23

SMT. SIMPLE JAIN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS W/O SRI P MUKESH KUMAR RESIDING AT NO.25, 4^TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS, S.R.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.

¶24

SMT. S. SANTHOSH BAI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SRI. C. SURESHCHAND, RESIDING AT NO. 174, MAIN ROAD, COX TOWN, JEEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 005.

¶25

…APPELLANTS

¶26

(BY SRI. SURYAPRAKASH RAO K, ADVOCATE)

¶27

AND:

¶28

M/S SRI VINAYAKA INFRA A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.51 & 52, 4^TH FLOOR, 8^TH MAIN, KSRTC LAYOUT,

¶29

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:34202-DB MFA No. 3990 of 2024

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

J.P.NAGAR, 2^ND PHASE, BENGALURU-560078

¶32

REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS REPRESNTED BY ITS PARTNERS

¶33

(A) L. R. RAVISHANKAR

¶34

(B) K.P. NAIDU

¶35

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI (RETD.) HAVING HIS OFFICE AT: ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶36

…RESPONDENTS

¶37

(BY SRI. HEGDE SUBRAHMANYA MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R1,

¶38

VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 10.02.2025 NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH)

¶39

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.37(1)(c) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DT.03.04.2024 PASSED IN A.P.NO.201/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/S.34 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996.

¶40

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶41

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶42

¶43

NC: 2025:KHC:34202-DB MFA No. 3990 of 2024

¶44

HC-KAR

¶45

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶46

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶47

It is submitted that appellant No.6 as well as respondent No.1 are present in the Court and are duly identified by the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶48

Learned counsel appearing on either side are present before the Court and submit that the entire disputes between the parties have been amicably settled.

¶49

The settlement arrived at between the parties recorded and reduced into writing in a joint memo, which is duly signed by the parties as well as their advocates, is accepted. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the joint memo. Decree shall be drawn up accordingly.

¶50

SD/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶51

SD/(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE

¶52

HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 97

Sri Bhadra Reddy v. M/S Sri Vinayaka Infra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Bhadra Reddy v. M/S Sri Vinayaka Infra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Shabana a @ Shabana Kausar Vs Dr Mohamed Ateeq

G. C. Ashok Kumar Vs the Karnataka State Ware Housing Corporation

Smt Premvathi Vs Mr Purandara

B N Shivaprakash Vs the Assistant Executive Engineer

A S Venkatesh Vs M Devendra

N C Paramesh Vs N B Devaraju