Dismissed¶¶35

The Managing Director v. Smt Rathnamma

Karnataka HC21 Aug 2025MFA/1142/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC DB oral judgment 21-08-2025; MFA No. 1142/2024 (ECA) by DSP Corporate Solutions Pvt. Ltd. under S.30(1) Employees Compensation Act 1923 with S.96 and O.XLI Rr.1-2 CPC against award dated 4-12-2022 in E.C.A. No.03/2022 (II Addl. Sr. Civil Judge & JMFC, Chikkaballapura); appeal DISMISSED for non-compliance of office objections / failure to deposit Rs. 18,33,802/- interest on awarded amount despite orders dated 12-6-2025, 30-7-2025, 6-8-2025; no merits decided; bench D K Singh & Venkatesh Naik T.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of objections, the appellant having failed, despite sufficient opportunities granted through orders dated 12-06-2025, 30-07-2025 and 06-08-2025, to deposit Rs. 18,33,802/- towards interest on the awarded amount. ¶¶35

The Managing Director Vs Smt Rathnamma — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:32588-DB MFA No. 1142 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1142 OF 2024 (ECA)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR DSP CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. E-55, BASEMENT LAJPATHNAGAR-II NEW DELHI-110 224 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. PARVEENKUMAR

¶11

Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

ALSO AT: THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT DSP CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. 13^TH CROSS, EAST PARK ROAD NEAR MLA COLLEGE OPP: SEVA SADANA BACK GATE MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 003.

¶13

…APPELLANT

¶14

(BY SRI MANJUNATHA B., ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

SMT. RATHNAMMA S/O. LATE HANUMANTHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS.

¶17

Y.H. JAGADISH S/O. LATE HANUMANTHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.

¶18

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:32588-DB MFA No. 1142 of 2024

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.14, HENNUR KADIRENAHALLI VILLAGE PARASADUBBE HATGAVARA POST NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI NAGESH M. AND N.S. JAYASIMHA, ADVOCATES, FOR R-1)

¶23

¶24

THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 30(1) OF THE EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923, READ WITH SECTION 96 AND ORDER XLI, RULES 1 AND 2 OF THE C.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 4-12-2022 PASSED IN E.C.A. NO.03 OF 2022 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., CHIKKABALLAPURA.

¶25

THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶27

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶28

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)

¶29

Learned counsel for the appellant is physically present

¶30

and submits that he has not complied with the office objections.

¶31

¶32

NC: 2025:KHC:32588-DB MFA No. 1142 of 2024

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

We have perused the order dated 12-6-2025, 30-7-2025 and 6-8-2025. In spite of granting sufficient opportunities, the appellant failed to deposit a sum of Rs.18,33,802/- towards interest on the awarded amount. Hence, the appeal is

¶35

dismissed for non-compliance of objections.

¶36

Sd/(D K SINGH) JUDGE

¶37

Sd/(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE

¶38

KVK

¶39

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

The Managing Director v. Smt Rathnamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Director v. Smt Rathnamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. S N Rathnamma Vs B K Ramesh

Smt Saroja Bai Vs Sri J C Mallikarjuna

Smt S P Prabha Vs Aruna G

Mrs. Roopa a. T. Vs State of Karnataka

Smt. Lakshmi. S Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Bathula Ravinder Vs Sri. Sanjay. P. R.